An analysis of the rate and reasons of rejected radiographs in emergency and non-emergency radiology departments in Yasuj, Iran

An analysis of the rate and reasons of rejected radiographs in emergency and non-emergency radiology departments in Yasuj, Iran


چاپ صفحه
پژوهان
صفحه نخست سامانه
نویسندگان
نویسندگان
اطلاعات تفضیلی
اطلاعات تفضیلی
دانلود مقاله
دانلود مقاله
دانشگاه علوم پزشکی تبریز
دانشگاه علوم پزشکی تبریز

نویسندگان: توحید مرتضی زاده

عنوان کنگره / همایش: سمپوزیوم بین المللی تصویربرداری پیش بالینی , Iran (Islamic Republic) , تهران , 2023

اطلاعات کلی مقاله
hide/show

نویسنده ثبت کننده مقاله توحید مرتضی زاده
مرحله جاری مقاله تایید نهایی
دانشکده/مرکز مربوطه دانشکده پزشکی
کد مقاله 85460
عنوان فارسی مقاله An analysis of the rate and reasons of rejected radiographs in emergency and non-emergency radiology departments in Yasuj, Iran
عنوان لاتین مقاله An analysis of the rate and reasons of rejected radiographs in emergency and non-emergency radiology departments in Yasuj, Iran
نوع ارائه پوستر
عنوان کنگره / همایش سمپوزیوم بین المللی تصویربرداری پیش بالینی
نوع کنگره / همایش بین المللی
کشور محل برگزاری کنگره/ همایش Iran (Islamic Republic)
شهر محل برگزاری کنگره/ همایش تهران
سال انتشار/ ارائه شمسی 1402
سال انتشار/ارائه میلادی 2023
تاریخ شمسی شروع و خاتمه کنگره/همایش 1402/08/17 الی 1402/08/18
آدرس لینک مقاله/ همایش در شبکه اینترنت
آدرس علمی (Affiliation) نویسنده متقاضی Department of Medical Physics, School of Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.

نویسندگان
hide/show

نویسنده نفر چندم مقاله
توحید مرتضی زادهچهارم

اطلاعات تفضیلی
hide/show

عنوان متن
خلاصه مقالهAbstract Background: Utilizing imaging to improve physicians' diagnostic accuracy is one of the primary priorities of radiology departments. When the image is of poor quality, it is likely to be rejected, and its repetition will expose patient and staff to unnecessary ionizing radiation. Given the significant nature of this issue, the aim of the current study was to evaluate the rate and reasons of radiograph rejections in emergency (public practice) and non-emergency (private practice) radiology departments of Yasuj, Iran. Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional study was carried out over a 14-day period in Yasuj, Iran, in the accident and emergency (round-the-clock) and non-emergency (day) medical imaging departments. In terms of quality, a total of 7006 images were classified in the following three grades; A (Good), B (Fair) and C (rejected). The grade C radiographs were categorized into 9 classes according to the reasons of rejection. Results: During this study, 7006 radiographs were examined, of which 6458 (92.2%) were categorized as grade A. Additionally, 401 radiographs (5.7%) were categorized as grade B, and 147 radiographs (2.1%) were considered to be grade C, which means that they were rejected. Out of the rejected radiographs, 69 (1.9%) were from emergency departments, while 78 (2.3%) were from non-emergency radiology departments. The most common reasons for the rejection of radiographs were the patient's incorrect positioning in 45 cases (30.6%) and the patient's motion in 43 cases (29.3%). Conclusion: In comparison to previous research, the current study's percentage of rejected images was deemed acceptable at 2.1%. Radiologists are advised to frequently assess the reason and rate for rejecting radiographs to enhance the effectiveness of their radiology unit.
کلمات کلیدیImage rejection, Computed radiography, digital radiography, Quality assurance, Image quality, image reject analysis

لینک دانلود مقاله
hide/show

نام فایل تاریخ درج فایل اندازه فایل دانلود
Hamed Zamani2.jpg1403/06/243223529دانلود
book 2023-final-.pdf1403/06/2419645867دانلود