Efficacy and safety of the biosimilar denosumab candidate (Arylia) compared to the reference product (Prolia®) in postmenopausal osteoporosis: a phase III, randomized, two-armed, double-blind, parallel, active-controlled, and noninferiority clinical trial

Efficacy and safety of the biosimilar denosumab candidate (Arylia) compared to the reference product (Prolia®) in postmenopausal osteoporosis: a phase III, randomized, two-armed, double-blind, parallel, active-controlled, and noninferiority clinical trial


چاپ صفحه
پژوهان
صفحه نخست سامانه
چکیده مقاله
چکیده مقاله
نویسندگان
نویسندگان
دانلود مقاله
دانلود مقاله
دانشگاه علوم پزشکی تبریز
دانشگاه علوم پزشکی تبریز

نویسندگان: علیرضا خبازی اسکویی

کلمات کلیدی: Denosumab, Arylia, Prolia®, Osteoporosis, Biosimilar

نشریه: 3410 , 161 , 24 , 2022

اطلاعات کلی مقاله
hide/show

نویسنده ثبت کننده مقاله علیرضا خبازی اسکویی
مرحله جاری مقاله تایید نهایی
دانشکده/مرکز مربوطه بیماری های بافت همبند
کد مقاله 79130
عنوان فارسی مقاله Efficacy and safety of the biosimilar denosumab candidate (Arylia) compared to the reference product (Prolia®) in postmenopausal osteoporosis: a phase III, randomized, two-armed, double-blind, parallel, active-controlled, and noninferiority clinical trial
عنوان لاتین مقاله Efficacy and safety of the biosimilar denosumab candidate (Arylia) compared to the reference product (Prolia®) in postmenopausal osteoporosis: a phase III, randomized, two-armed, double-blind, parallel, active-controlled, and noninferiority clinical trial
ناشر 18
آیا مقاله از طرح تحقیقاتی و یا منتورشیپ استخراج شده است؟ خیر
عنوان نشریه (خارج از لیست فوق)
نوع مقاله Original Article
نحوه ایندکس شدن مقاله ایندکس شده سطح یک – ISI - Web of Science
آدرس لینک مقاله/ همایش در شبکه اینترنت

خلاصه مقاله
hide/show

Background/objective: Osteoporosis is a global health concern with an increasing prevalence worldwide. Denosumab is an antiresoptive agent that has been demonstrated to be efective and safe in osteoporotic patients. This study aimed to compare the efcacy and safety of the biosimilar denosumab candidate (Arylia) to the originator product (Prolia®) in postmenopausal osteoporotic patients. Methods: In this randomized, double-blind, active-controlled, noninferiority trial, postmenopausal osteoporotic patients received 60 mg of subcutaneous Arylia or Prolia® at months 0, 6, and 12 and were followed up for 18 months. The primary endpoint was the noninferiority of the biosimilar product to the reference product in the percentage change of bone mineral density (BMD) in 18 months at the lumbar spine (L1-L4), total hip, and femoral neck. The secondary endpoints were safety assessment, the incidence of new vertebral fractures, and the trend of bone turnover markers (BTMs). Results: A total of 190 patients were randomized to receive either biosimilar (n= 95) or reference (n= 95) denosumab. In the per-protocol (PP) analysis, the lower limits of the 95% two-sided confdence intervals of the diference between Arylia and Prolia® in increasing BMD were greater than the predetermined noninferiority margin of− 1.78 at the lumbar spine, total hip, and femoral neck sites (mean diferences [95% CIs] of 0.39 [− 1.34 to 2.11], 0.04 [− 1.61 to 1.69], and 0.41 [− 1.58 to 2.40], respectively). The two products were also comparable in terms of safety, new vertebral fractures, and trend of BTMs. Conclusion: The efcacy of the biosimilar denosumab was shown to be noninferior to that of the reference denosumab, with a comparable safety profle at 18 months.

نویسندگان
hide/show

نویسنده نفر چندم مقاله
علیرضا خبازی اسکوییهشتم

لینک دانلود مقاله
hide/show

نام فایل تاریخ درج فایل اندازه فایل دانلود
Efficacy and safety of the biosimilar.pdf1401/04/241445755دانلود