Comparative CBCT Assessment of Obturation Quality in Different Obturation Techniques

Comparative CBCT Assessment of Obturation Quality in Different Obturation Techniques


چاپ صفحه
پژوهان
صفحه نخست سامانه
چکیده مقاله
چکیده مقاله
نویسندگان
نویسندگان
دانلود مقاله
دانلود مقاله
دانشگاه علوم پزشکی تبریز
دانشگاه علوم پزشکی تبریز

نویسندگان: وحید زند , امین سالم میلانی , ثابته باقری سبزوار

کلمات کلیدی: Bioceramic sealer, CBCT, Lateral, compaction, TotalFill, Vertical compaction

نشریه: 19911 , 2 , 11 , 2022

اطلاعات کلی مقاله
hide/show

نویسنده ثبت کننده مقاله وحید زند
مرحله جاری مقاله تایید نهایی
دانشکده/مرکز مربوطه دانشکده دندانپزشکی
کد مقاله 78917
عنوان فارسی مقاله Comparative CBCT Assessment of Obturation Quality in Different Obturation Techniques
عنوان لاتین مقاله Comparative CBCT Assessment of Obturation Quality in Different Obturation Techniques
ناشر 5
آیا مقاله از طرح تحقیقاتی و یا منتورشیپ استخراج شده است؟ خیر
عنوان نشریه (خارج از لیست فوق)
نوع مقاله Original Article
نحوه ایندکس شدن مقاله ایندکس شده سطح چهار – سایر سایت های تخصصی
آدرس لینک مقاله/ همایش در شبکه اینترنت

خلاصه مقاله
hide/show

Introduction: Different techniques and materials have been introduced over time to improve the quality of root canal treatment. This study aimed to compare the quality of root canal obturation using three root canal obturation techniques based on the existing void using cone beam computed tomography imaging techniques. Methods: Thirty-three single canal teeth were selected and the root canals were prepared. The roots were obturated with single-cone, lateral compaction with cold gutta-percha, and vertical compaction techniques. Afterward, the roots were scanned, and the presence of voids in the 1-, 3-, 5-, and 7-mm sections of the root apex was investigated, and then the area and volume of voids were calculated by Mimics 10.01 software. Results: The highest percentage of voids presence in all groups was detected in the 7-mm section of the apex (60.6%) , while the lowest percentage was found in the 1-mm section of the apex (12.1%). Conclusion: There was no significant difference between the three techniques evaluated in this study in terms of void size, void volume, and obturation quality. Voids were present in all samples. Considering the technique used to obturate the root canals, voids were different in terms of shape and volume.

نویسندگان
hide/show

نویسنده نفر چندم مقاله
وحید زنداول
امین سالم میلانیدوم
ثابته باقری سبزوارچهارم

لینک دانلود مقاله
hide/show

نام فایل تاریخ درج فایل اندازه فایل دانلود
zand JDMT-Volume 11-Issue 2-Pages 84-92.pdf1401/03/25500832دانلود