Intermediate-Dose versus Standard-Dose Prophylactic Anticoagulation in Patients with COVID-19 Admitted to the Intensive Care Unit: 90-Day Results from the INSPIRATION Randomized Trial

Intermediate-Dose versus Standard-Dose Prophylactic Anticoagulation in Patients with COVID-19 Admitted to the Intensive Care Unit: 90-Day Results from the INSPIRATION Randomized Trial


چاپ صفحه
پژوهان
صفحه نخست سامانه
چکیده مقاله
چکیده مقاله
نویسندگان
نویسندگان
دانلود مقاله
دانلود مقاله
دانشگاه علوم پزشکی تبریز
دانشگاه علوم پزشکی تبریز

نویسندگان: فرید رشیدی , پریسا رضائی فر , سمیرا متین , اوریا تهمتن

کلمات کلیدی: anticoagulation, heparin, enoxaparin, COVID-19, trial

نشریه: 33520 , January , 122 , 2022

اطلاعات کلی مقاله
hide/show

نویسنده ثبت کننده مقاله فرید رشیدی
مرحله جاری مقاله تایید نهایی
دانشکده/مرکز مربوطه مرکز تحقیقات سل و بیماری های ریوی
کد مقاله 78554
عنوان فارسی مقاله Intermediate-Dose versus Standard-Dose Prophylactic Anticoagulation in Patients with COVID-19 Admitted to the Intensive Care Unit: 90-Day Results from the INSPIRATION Randomized Trial
عنوان لاتین مقاله Intermediate-Dose versus Standard-Dose Prophylactic Anticoagulation in Patients with COVID-19 Admitted to the Intensive Care Unit: 90-Day Results from the INSPIRATION Randomized Trial
ناشر 60
آیا مقاله از طرح تحقیقاتی و یا منتورشیپ استخراج شده است؟ بلی
عنوان نشریه (خارج از لیست فوق)
نوع مقاله Original Article
نحوه ایندکس شدن مقاله ایندکس شده سطح یک – ISI - Web of Science
آدرس لینک مقاله/ همایش در شبکه اینترنت

خلاصه مقاله
hide/show

Background: Thrombotic complications are considered among the main extrapulmonary manifestations of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). The optimal type and duration of prophylactic antithrombotic therapy in these patients remain unknown. Methods: This article reports the final (90-day) results of the Intermediate versus Standard-dose Prophylactic anticoagulation In cRitically-ill pATIents with COVID-19: An opeN label randomized controlled trial (INSPIRATION) study. Patients with COVID-19 admitted to intensive care were randomized to intermediate-dose versus standarddose prophylactic anticoagulation for 30 days, irrespective of hospital discharge status. The primary efficacy outcome was a composite of adjudicated venous or arterial thrombosis, treatment with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), or allcause death. The main safety outcome was major bleeding. Results: Of 600 randomized patients, 562 entered the modified intention-to-treat analysis (median age [Q1, Q3]: 62 [50, 71] years; 237 [42.2%] women), of whom 336 (59.8%) survived to hospital discharge. The primary outcome occurred in 132 (47.8%) of patients assigned to intermediate dose and 130 (45.4%) patients assigned to standard-dose prophylactic anticoagulation (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.21, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.95–1.55, p¼ 0.11). Findings were similar for other efficacy outcomes, and in the landmark analysis from days 31 to 90 (HR: 1.59, 95% CI: 0.45–5.06). There were 7 (2.5%) major bleeding events in the intermediate-dose group (including 3 fatal events) and 4 (1.4%) major bleeding events in the standard-dose group (none fatal) (HR: 1.82, 95% CI: 0.53–6.24). Conclusion: Intermediate-dose compared with standard-dose prophylactic anticoagulation did not reduce a composite of death, treatment with ECMO, or venous or arterial thrombosis at 90-day follow-up.

نویسندگان
hide/show

نویسنده نفر چندم مقاله
فرید رشیدیسوم
پریسا رضائی فرششم
سمیرا متینهشتم
اوریا تهمتندهم

لینک دانلود مقاله
hide/show

نام فایل تاریخ درج فایل اندازه فایل دانلود
Intermediate ....pdf1401/02/04453491دانلود