The effects of topical and oral Nigella sativa oil on clinical findings in knee osteoarthritis: A double-blind, randomized controlled trial

The effects of topical and oral Nigella sativa oil on clinical findings in knee osteoarthritis: A double-blind, randomized controlled trial


چاپ صفحه
پژوهان
صفحه نخست سامانه
چکیده مقاله
چکیده مقاله
نویسندگان
نویسندگان
دانلود مقاله
دانلود مقاله
دانشگاه علوم پزشکی تبریز
دانشگاه علوم پزشکی تبریز

نویسندگان: ندا دولت خواه , افسانه امیرطاهری افشار , محمد رهبر , وحیده توپچی زاده تبریزیان

کلمات کلیدی: Osteoarthritis Nigella sativa Visual analogue scale Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index Timed up & go test

نشریه: 20407 , 100562 , 33 , 2022

اطلاعات کلی مقاله
hide/show

نویسنده ثبت کننده مقاله وحیده توپچی زاده تبریزیان
مرحله جاری مقاله تایید نهایی
دانشکده/مرکز مربوطه طب فیزیکی وتوانبخشی
کد مقاله 78549
عنوان فارسی مقاله The effects of topical and oral Nigella sativa oil on clinical findings in knee osteoarthritis: A double-blind, randomized controlled trial
عنوان لاتین مقاله The effects of topical and oral Nigella sativa oil on clinical findings in knee osteoarthritis: A double-blind, randomized controlled trial
ناشر 6
آیا مقاله از طرح تحقیقاتی و یا منتورشیپ استخراج شده است؟ بلی
عنوان نشریه (خارج از لیست فوق)
نوع مقاله Original Article
نحوه ایندکس شدن مقاله ایندکس شده سطح یک – ISI - Web of Science
آدرس لینک مقاله/ همایش در شبکه اینترنت

خلاصه مقاله
hide/show

Introduction: The objective of this trial was to determine the efficacy and safety of topical and oral application of Nigella sativa (N.Sativa) oil compared to the placebo in knee osteoarthritis (KOA) patients. Methods: Patients with mild to moderate KOA were enrolled in this double-blind randomized controlled trial and randomly assigned to receive oral (2.5 ml of N. Sativa oil twice a day) or topical N.Sativa oil (2.5 ml of N.Sativa oil three times a day) or placebo for 6 weeks. The primary outcome measures were the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), visual analogue scale (VAS), and timed up & go test (TUG) scores. The secondary outcome measures were WOMAC subscale (pain, stiffness, and limitations of physical function) scores. Results: In total, 40 patients completed the study. VAS, WOMAC pain, WOMAC limitations of physical function and WOMAC total score improved significantly in the oral and topical N.Sativa groups. However, VAS (4.60 ± 1.79–2.53 ± 2.03) and WOMAC pain (6.90 ± 3.34–3.86 ± 2.52) improved more significantly only in the Topical N.Sativa group compared to the placebo group (p = 0.005 and p = 0.015). Additionally, topical N.Sativa oil was more efficient than oral N.Sativa oil in improving WOMAC limitations of physical function (26.73 ± 10.29–11.73 ± 6.74 vs. 27.41 ± 10.79–19.35 ± 9.11, respectively) and WOMAC total scores 35.70 ± 13.63–17.13 ± 9.80 vs. 38.47 ± 15.03–27.35 ± 12.76, respectively) in patients (all p-values<0.05). Conclusions: Topical application of N.Sativa oil was more efficient than the oral intake of N.Sativa oil in improving WOMAC total and limitations of physical function scores in patients with KOA

نویسندگان
hide/show

نویسنده نفر چندم مقاله
ندا دولت خواهاول
افسانه امیرطاهری افشاردوم
محمد رهبرچهارم
وحیده توپچی زاده تبریزیانپنجم

لینک دانلود مقاله
hide/show

نام فایل تاریخ درج فایل اندازه فایل دانلود
123.pdf1401/02/02897363دانلود