چاپ صفحه |  صفحه نخست سامانه |  چکیده مقاله |  نویسندگان |  دانلود مقاله | دانشگاه علوم پزشکی تبریز |
| Background:Review studies have reported on the low quality of study methodolo-gies and poor reporting of knowledge translation (KT) interventional studies. Thisflaw cause the result of such studies to become misleading.Objectives:The present review is designed to evaluate the effect of methodologicalfactors on the results of interventional studies that aimed to evaluate KT strategiesat the policy level.Search Methods:Bibliographic databases and grey literature databases will besearched. The retrieved studies will be recorded in Covidence. After screening titlesand abstracts, the full texts of selected studies will be assessed against the inclusioncriteria. Disagreements will be resolved through discussion or by consultation with athird author.Selection Criteria:Primary studies are studies that aimed to estimate the efficacyof KT strategies to improve evidence‐informed policymaking. Study participantsinclude policymakers and the intervention is a KT strategy. The main outcome isthe desired changes in policy‐makers towards evidence‐informed decision‐making.Data Collection and Analysis:The main effect sizes will be expressed as standardmean difference and its variance for the main efficacy outcome of KT strategies inprimary studies. Forest plot meta‐analysis will be used to synthesize the effect ofeach group of KT strategies. The contribution of ROB to the efficacy of KTinterventions will be assessed via Meta‐epidemiology analysis. The overall estimatewill be calculated using inverse‐variance random‐effects meta‐analysis with a 95%confidence interval for the estimate. |
| نویسنده | نفر چندم مقاله |
|---|---|
| لیلا دشمنگیر | سوم |
| نام فایل | تاریخ درج فایل | اندازه فایل | دانلود |
|---|---|---|---|
| Campbell Systematic Reviews - 2022 - Ahmadi - PROTOCOL Systematic review of methods to reduce risk of bias in knowledge.pdf | 1401/01/25 | 1213358 | دانلود |
