چاپ صفحه |  صفحه نخست سامانه |  نویسندگان |  اطلاعات تفضیلی |  دانلود مقاله | دانشگاه علوم پزشکی تبریز |
| نویسنده | نفر چندم مقاله |
|---|---|
| شیرین فتاحی | اول |
| سپیده وثوق حسینی | دوم |
| پریا اماموردیزاده | سوم |
| عنوان | متن |
|---|---|
| کلمات کلیدی | ultrasound; radiograph;periapical lesions |
| خلاصه مقاله | Background: Periapical granulomas and radicular cysts together make up nearly 90% of the periapical lesions and is important to distinguish periapical lesions as cysts or granulomas. Conventional radiographs, the most commonly available tool in the dental clinic, have been used to distinguish cysts and granulomas based on their appearance .Recently, 3D radiographic imaging and other tecniques such asultrasonography (USG) has also been used to differentially diagnose periapical lesions from cyst. The differentiation of periapical lesions with radiologic modalities has shown results with varying accuracies. Diagnostic ultrasonography, a safe, rapid, accurate, noninvasive, and easily reproducible dynamic modality providing “live” images, could be used to differentiate among solid, cystic, mixed, and dense cystic lesions. This method has proved its marked efficiency in the field of medicine, whereas it posses less exploration with little work in the field of dentistry. Methods: This review, aimed to determine the diagnostic accuracy of imaging modalities of radiography,in comparison to ultrasound imaging. Conclusion: Ultrasound offers a non-invasive, radiation-free method for detecting periapical lesions in the jaws. It provides better diagnostic accuracy for differentiating endodontic lesions compared to radiographic imaging. |
| نام فایل | تاریخ درج فایل | اندازه فایل | دانلود |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4.pdf | 1400/12/14 | 260343 | دانلود |
| 6.pdf | 1400/12/14 | 397813 | دانلود |
