ارزیابی استفاده از هپارین، انوکساپارین و پیشگیری مکانیکی در پیشگیری از DVT در یک بیمارستان آموزشی بزرگ در غرب ایران

Heparin, Enoxaparin, and Mechanical Prophylaxis Utilization Evaluation in DVT Prophylaxis in a Major Teaching Hospital in West of Iran


چاپ صفحه
پژوهان
صفحه نخست سامانه
چکیده مقاله
چکیده مقاله
نویسندگان
نویسندگان
دانلود مقاله
دانلود مقاله
دانشگاه علوم پزشکی تبریز
دانشگاه علوم پزشکی تبریز

نویسندگان: هادی همیشه کار , آنالی علی اکبری , سجاد خیالی

کلمات کلیدی: Prophylaxis; Venous Thrombosis; Heparin; Enoxaparin; Thromboembolic Events

نشریه: 0 , 4 , 9 , 2021

اطلاعات کلی مقاله
hide/show

نویسنده ثبت کننده مقاله هادی همیشه کار
مرحله جاری مقاله تایید نهایی
دانشکده/مرکز مربوطه دانشکده داروسازی
کد مقاله 77980
عنوان فارسی مقاله ارزیابی استفاده از هپارین، انوکساپارین و پیشگیری مکانیکی در پیشگیری از DVT در یک بیمارستان آموزشی بزرگ در غرب ایران
عنوان لاتین مقاله Heparin, Enoxaparin, and Mechanical Prophylaxis Utilization Evaluation in DVT Prophylaxis in a Major Teaching Hospital in West of Iran
ناشر 3
آیا مقاله از طرح تحقیقاتی و یا منتورشیپ استخراج شده است؟ خیر
عنوان نشریه (خارج از لیست فوق) journal of pharmaceutical care
نوع مقاله Original Article
نحوه ایندکس شدن مقاله ایندکس شده سطح چهار – ISC - Islamic Science Citation
آدرس لینک مقاله/ همایش در شبکه اینترنت

خلاصه مقاله
hide/show

Background: Considering the high prevalence and risk of Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary thromboembolism (PTE) in hospitalized patients and the existence of different prophylaxis methods in these patients, the necessity of evaluating the rational administration of heparin or enoxaparin and mechanical prophylaxis is one of the important priorities. The present study aimed to evaluate the consistency of the Heparin/Enoxaparin administration in comparison to guidelines in patients admitted to Imam Reza Hospital. Methods: In this prospective study drug use evaluation (DUE), 300 hospitalized patients receiving venous thrombosis prophylaxis were enrolled, of which 150 patients were selected from surgical wards and 150 patients from internal wards. The demographic and clinical data of patients were collected using clinical records of them. We used the checklists based on the Geneva System for patients admitted to internal wards and the Caprini Questionnaire for patients in surgical wards to evaluate whether patients had received heparin/enoxaparin prophylaxis and mechanical DVT prevention according to guidelines. Results: T: In the surgical ward, prophylactic treatment for venous thrombosis was administered in 85 (56.6%) patients admitted to surgical wards in accordance with the clinical guideline and in the internal ward, in 42 (28%) patients, with a significant difference between two sections (P: 0.0001). Mechanical prophylaxis, including compressive socks, was performed in 99 (66%) patients in the surgical ward and in the internal ward only in 56 (37.4%) patients, according to the guideline. Drug prophylaxis was administered in surgical wards in 116 (77.3%) patients and in internal wards, in 79 (52.6%) patients according to the guideline. Conclusion: Intravenous thrombosis prophylaxis, according to the guidelines, is more common in patients admitted to surgical wards than in internal wards. But in both sectors, statistics are far from international standards.

نویسندگان
hide/show

نویسنده نفر چندم مقاله
هادی همیشه کارسوم
آنالی علی اکبریاول
سجاد خیالیدوم

لینک دانلود مقاله
hide/show

نام فایل تاریخ درج فایل اندازه فایل دانلود
Heparin, Enoxaparin, and Mechanical Prophylaxis Utilization Evaluation in DVT Prophylaxis in a Major Teaching Hospital in West of Iran.pdf1400/11/10727424دانلود