The Quality of Randomized Controlled Trial in Cochrane Kidney and Transplant Group

The Quality of Randomized Controlled Trial in Cochrane Kidney and Transplant Group


چاپ صفحه
پژوهان
صفحه نخست سامانه
چکیده مقاله
چکیده مقاله
نویسندگان
نویسندگان
دانلود مقاله
دانلود مقاله
دانشگاه علوم پزشکی تبریز
دانشگاه علوم پزشکی تبریز

نویسندگان: هانیه صالحی پورمهر , علی مصطفائی , امیر مهدی زاده حقیقی , سکینه حاج ابراهیمی , لیلا حسینی , زهرا شیخ علیپور , نسرین ابوالحسن پور

کلمات کلیدی: Risk of bias, randomized controlled trial, Cochrane, systematic review

نشریه: 0 , 4 , 8 , 2021

اطلاعات کلی مقاله
hide/show

نویسنده ثبت کننده مقاله هانیه صالحی پورمهر
مرحله جاری مقاله تایید نهایی
دانشکده/مرکز مربوطه مرکز تحقیقات پزشکی مبتنی بر شواهد EBM
کد مقاله 77636
عنوان فارسی مقاله The Quality of Randomized Controlled Trial in Cochrane Kidney and Transplant Group
عنوان لاتین مقاله The Quality of Randomized Controlled Trial in Cochrane Kidney and Transplant Group
ناشر 7
آیا مقاله از طرح تحقیقاتی و یا منتورشیپ استخراج شده است؟ بلی
عنوان نشریه (خارج از لیست فوق) Journal of Urological Surgery
نوع مقاله Original Article
نحوه ایندکس شدن مقاله ایندکس شده سطح یک – ISI - Web of Science
آدرس لینک مقاله/ همایش در شبکه اینترنت

خلاصه مقاله
hide/show

Objective: Misconduct is one of the important issues in research integrity. Cochrane systematic reviews are known for their best level of evidence. Since kidney failure is a major public health problem worldwide, the Cochrane Library provides a robust and reliable database to upgrade medical knowledge and make the best medical decisions. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the quality of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that are included in the Cochrane systematic reviews of kidney and transplant groups. Materials and Methods: This analytic cross-sectional study was conducted on systematic reviews of kidney and transplant group of Cochrane reviews. All types of biases in the understudied RCTs or quasi-RCTs of these systematic reviews were evaluated using the Cochrane appraisal checklist. The types of biases in included studies were also separated and stratified. Descriptive statistics were used for data analysis using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences 16. Results: A total of 267 systematic reviews and their understudied 3213 RCTs were evaluated. In the kidney and transplant group, the highest risk of bias was seen in allocation concealment bias, whereas the most common bias was unclear allocation concealment (selection bias). From 2008 to 2009, high random sequence generation bias has dramatically increased, and after decreasing, the gradual growth has been continuing over time. Furthermore, the low detection bias has reduced surprisingly in 2011 then decreased in 2012-2013. Conclusion: Regarding high risks of performance and random sequence generation biases in understudied RCTs, critical structure deficiencies were obvious. Therefore, observing integrity principles to prevent research misconduct is recommended.

نویسندگان
hide/show

نویسنده نفر چندم مقاله
هانیه صالحی پورمهراول
علی مصطفائیدوم
امیر مهدی زاده حقیقیسوم
سکینه حاج ابراهیمیچهارم
لیلا حسینیپنجم
زهرا شیخ علیپورششم
نسرین ابوالحسن پورهفتم

لینک دانلود مقاله
hide/show

نام فایل تاریخ درج فایل اندازه فایل دانلود
JUS-8-266-En.pdf1400/09/27489301دانلود