Long-Term Dexmedetomidine versus Midazolam in Patients Under Mechanical Ventilation: A Double-blinded Randomized Clinical Trial

Long-Term Dexmedetomidine versus Midazolam in Patients Under Mechanical Ventilation: A Double-blinded Randomized Clinical Trial


چاپ صفحه
پژوهان
صفحه نخست سامانه
چکیده مقاله
چکیده مقاله
نویسندگان
نویسندگان
دانلود مقاله
دانلود مقاله
دانشگاه علوم پزشکی تبریز
دانشگاه علوم پزشکی تبریز

نویسندگان: کامران شادور , سروین سنایی اسکویی , هادی همیشه کار , سعید صفیری , عطا محمودپور

کلمات کلیدی: Dexmedetomidine, Long-term Sedation, Critical Care, Mechanical ventilation

نشریه: 0 , 3 , 6 , 2021

اطلاعات کلی مقاله
hide/show

نویسنده ثبت کننده مقاله عطا محمودپور
مرحله جاری مقاله تایید نهایی
دانشکده/مرکز مربوطه دانشکده پزشکی
کد مقاله 77406
عنوان فارسی مقاله Long-Term Dexmedetomidine versus Midazolam in Patients Under Mechanical Ventilation: A Double-blinded Randomized Clinical Trial
عنوان لاتین مقاله Long-Term Dexmedetomidine versus Midazolam in Patients Under Mechanical Ventilation: A Double-blinded Randomized Clinical Trial
ناشر 8
آیا مقاله از طرح تحقیقاتی و یا منتورشیپ استخراج شده است؟ بلی
عنوان نشریه (خارج از لیست فوق) Journal of Cellular & Molecular Anesthesia
نوع مقاله Original Article
نحوه ایندکس شدن مقاله ایندکس شده سطح سه – Scopus
آدرس لینک مقاله/ همایش در شبکه اینترنت

خلاصه مقاله
hide/show

Background: Dexmedetomidine has been approved for short-term analgesia and sedation of patients in the intensive care unit (ICU). Longer duration of sedation with Dexmedetomidine is off-label, and its safety has not yet been tested. This study aims to examine the safety profile for long-term use of Dexmedetomidine and compare it to midazolam (MID) based sedation in the ICU. Materials and Methods: One hundred and one patients on mechanical ventilation were randomized to receive either Dexmedetomidine 0.2-1.0 µg/kg/h or MID 20- 40 µg/kg/h in a double-blinded fashion to reach the target of -2 to 1 on the Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS). Duration of mechanical ventilation was the primary endpoint; secondary endpoints included the occurrences of composite cardiac adverse event (CCAE), bradycardia, hypotension, significant dysrhythmias, heart failure myocardial infarction or death within 28 days, ICU length of stay, need for additive analgesic, time spent at target sedation, and delirium. Results: The duration of mechanical ventilation and ICU stay were almost two days shorter in the Dexmedetomidine group (P= 0.002 and 0.001, respectively), but regarding CCAE, sinus bradycardia occurred more frequently (P= 0.399), and mortality was similar in both groups (P=0.378). Conclusion: Our results confirmed the results of previous trials showing that long-term Dexmedetomidine was comparable to benzodiazepines for the frequency of major complications in critically ill patients. Physicians should weigh these benefits against the occurrence of significant bradycardia and hypotension.

نویسندگان
hide/show

نویسنده نفر چندم مقاله
کامران شادوردوم
سروین سنایی اسکوییچهارم
هادی همیشه کارششم
سعید صفیریهفتم
عطا محمودپورهشتم

لینک دانلود مقاله
hide/show

نام فایل تاریخ درج فایل اندازه فایل دانلود
Dex2-1.pdf1400/08/29707141دانلود
name akhlaghe dr pilevar.pdf1400/09/01155000دانلود