Comparison of the Therapeutic Effects of a Pigtail Catheter and Chest Tube in the Treatment of Spontaneous Pneumothorax: A Randomized Clinical Trial Study
Comparison of the Therapeutic Effects of a Pigtail Catheter and Chest Tube in the Treatment of Spontaneous Pneumothorax: A Randomized Clinical Trial Study
نویسندگان: سید ضیاالدین راثی هاشمی , حسن امینی
کلمات کلیدی: Spontaneous pneumothorax, chest tube, pigtail catheter, pain
نشریه: 0 , 6 , 22 , 2021
| نویسنده ثبت کننده مقاله |
سید ضیاالدین راثی هاشمی |
| مرحله جاری مقاله |
تایید نهایی |
| دانشکده/مرکز مربوطه |
دانشکده پزشکی |
| کد مقاله |
77269 |
| عنوان فارسی مقاله |
Comparison of the Therapeutic Effects of a Pigtail Catheter and Chest Tube in the Treatment of Spontaneous Pneumothorax: A Randomized Clinical Trial Study |
| عنوان لاتین مقاله |
Comparison of the Therapeutic Effects of a Pigtail Catheter and Chest Tube in the Treatment of Spontaneous Pneumothorax: A Randomized Clinical Trial Study |
| ناشر |
3 |
| آیا مقاله از طرح تحقیقاتی و یا منتورشیپ استخراج شده است؟ |
خیر |
| عنوان نشریه (خارج از لیست فوق) |
turkish thoracic journal |
| نوع مقاله |
Original Article |
| نحوه ایندکس شدن مقاله |
ایندکس شده سطح یک – ISI - Web of Science |
| آدرس لینک مقاله/ همایش در شبکه اینترنت |
|
| OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare the therapeutic effects of a pigtail catheter with a chest tube in the management
of patients with spontaneous pneumothorax (SP).
MATERIAL AND METHODS: A randomized controlled trial study was performed on patients with SP from August 2016 to December
2017 at Imam Reza Hospital, Tabriz, Iran. Forty-four patients were randomly assigned into 2 groups: group A with a 14-Fr pigtail catheter
and group B using a 28-Fr chest tube. Two patients were excluded from the study.
RESULTS: Forty-two patients participated in the study with 21 patients in each group. There were no significant differences between the
groups in the patients’ baseline data. The success rate was higher in patients with pigtail catheters (85.7%) than in patients with chest
tubes (76.2%). However, the difference was not significant (P = .43). The procedure time was significantly shorter in the pigtail group
compared to the chest tube group (P < .01). According to the visual analog scale (VAS), patients with pigtail catheters experienced milder
pain during tube insertion than patients with chest tubes (P = .02). However, the pain score at the insertion site was not significantly different between the 2 groups for the first 2 days after the procedure. Patients with pigtail catheters experienced significantly less pain than
patients with chest tubes during removal of the tube (P < .01). Also, there was no significant difference between the pain experienced by
the 2 groups at the time of hospital discharge (P = .19). Analgesic drug usage was lower in patients with pigtail catheters compared to
patients with chest tubes (P < .01). There was a trend toward lower median hospital stays demonstrated by patients with pigtail catheters
compared to patients with chest tubes (P = .2).
CONCLUSION: Pigtail catheters might be as effective as chest tubes for treating patients with SP in terms of lung re-expansion |
| نام فایل |
تاریخ درج فایل |
اندازه فایل |
دانلود |
| TTJ November 2021-459-465.pdf | 1400/08/14 | 1111128 | دانلود |
| ethic.jpg | 1400/08/18 | 2345428 | دانلود |
| rasi.pdf | 1400/09/13 | 169081 | دانلود |