Effect of Different Prophylaxis Methods on Microleakage of Microfilled Composite Restorations
Effect of Different Prophylaxis Methods on Microleakage of Microfilled Composite Restorations
نویسندگان: سودابه کیمیائی , نرمین محمدی , پرنیان علیزاده اسکویی , فاطمه پورنقی آذر , محمد اسماعیل ابراهیمی چهارم
کلمات کلیدی: Microfilled composite resin, microleakage, prophylaxis methods
نشریه: 19913 , 2 , 6 , 2012
| نویسنده ثبت کننده مقاله |
سودابه کیمیائی |
| مرحله جاری مقاله |
تایید نهایی |
| دانشکده/مرکز مربوطه |
مرکز تحقیقات لثه و دندان |
| کد مقاله |
76276 |
| عنوان فارسی مقاله |
Effect of Different Prophylaxis Methods on Microleakage of Microfilled Composite Restorations |
| عنوان لاتین مقاله |
Effect of Different Prophylaxis Methods on Microleakage of Microfilled Composite Restorations |
| ناشر |
6 |
| آیا مقاله از طرح تحقیقاتی و یا منتورشیپ استخراج شده است؟ |
بلی |
| عنوان نشریه (خارج از لیست فوق) |
|
| نوع مقاله |
Original Article |
| نحوه ایندکس شدن مقاله |
ایندکس شده سطح دو – PubMed |
| آدرس لینک مقاله/ همایش در شبکه اینترنت |
|
| Background and aims. This study was aimed at evaluating the effect of different prophylaxis methods on microleakage of microfilled composite restorations.
Materials and methods. In this in vitro study, class V cavities were prepared on buccal surfaces of 84 bovine teeth. The
teeth were restored with Tetric N-Bond adhesive and Heliomolar composite resin. Subsequent to a thermocycling procedure
and three months of storage in distilled water, the teeth were randomly assigned to four groups (n=21): (1) prophylaxis with
a rubber cup and pumice; (2) prophylaxis with a brush and pumice; (3) prophylaxis with air/powder polishing device; and
(4) no prophylaxis (the control group). Then the teeth were immersed in 2% basic fuchsin for 24 hours and sectioned for
microleakage evaluation under a stereomicroscope. Data were analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis and Wilcoxon Signed Ranks
tests. Statistical significance was defined at p<0.05.
Results. There were no statistically significant differences in occlusal and gingival microleakage between the groups
(p=0.996 and p=0.860, respectively). In all the groups gingival margins exhibited significantly higher microleakage values
compared to occlusal margins (p<0.0005).
Conclusion. Prophylaxis methods had no adverse effect on marginal leakage of microfilled composite resin restorations. |
| نام فایل |
تاریخ درج فایل |
اندازه فایل |
دانلود |
| joddd-6-65.pdf | 1400/04/15 | 125555 | دانلود |