Assessment of the Adherence Rate of Acute Chemotherapy Induced Nausea and Vomiting Prophylaxis Regimens by Medical Team to NCCN Clinical Recommendations: Cross-Section Observation

Assessment of the Adherence Rate of Acute Chemotherapy Induced Nausea and Vomiting Prophylaxis Regimens by Medical Team to NCCN Clinical Recommendations: Cross-Section Observation


چاپ صفحه
پژوهان
صفحه نخست سامانه
چکیده مقاله
چکیده مقاله
نویسندگان
نویسندگان
دانلود مقاله
دانلود مقاله
دانشگاه علوم پزشکی تبریز
دانشگاه علوم پزشکی تبریز

نویسندگان: محمد محمدزاده , شهاب الدین هاتفی , نازلی رشادی , زهره صناعت , صبا غفاری

کلمات کلیدی: Antiemetics; Antineoplastic Agents; Nausea; Vomiting

نشریه: 0 , 1 , 9 , 2021

اطلاعات کلی مقاله
hide/show

نویسنده ثبت کننده مقاله صبا غفاری
مرحله جاری مقاله تایید نهایی
دانشکده/مرکز مربوطه مرکز تحقیقات هماتولوژی و انکولوژی
کد مقاله 75637
عنوان فارسی مقاله Assessment of the Adherence Rate of Acute Chemotherapy Induced Nausea and Vomiting Prophylaxis Regimens by Medical Team to NCCN Clinical Recommendations: Cross-Section Observation
عنوان لاتین مقاله Assessment of the Adherence Rate of Acute Chemotherapy Induced Nausea and Vomiting Prophylaxis Regimens by Medical Team to NCCN Clinical Recommendations: Cross-Section Observation
ناشر 5
آیا مقاله از طرح تحقیقاتی و یا منتورشیپ استخراج شده است؟ بلی
عنوان نشریه (خارج از لیست فوق) Journal of Pharmaceutical Care
نوع مقاله Original Article
نحوه ایندکس شدن مقاله ایندکس شده سطح چهار – Embase
آدرس لینک مقاله/ همایش در شبکه اینترنت

خلاصه مقاله
hide/show

Background: Chemotherapy induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) is still distressing adverse effect for patients. Thus, we conducted this study to assess the compliance of CINV prophylaxis patterns with NCCN guideline. Methods: 136 Patients with any kind of malignancy who undergoes chemotherapy in Shahid Ghazi hospital, Tabriz, Iran, were included in this study. Adherence rate to the NCCN guideline of anti-emetic therapy for different emetogenic potential chemotherapy regimens was evaluated. Results: All patients received their prophylaxis 30 min before chemotherapy, which is completely adherent to guideline. Hematological malignancies were associated with higher adherence rate (P=0.032). For high and moderate emetic risk patients, dexamethasone and ondansetron were remarkably under-dosed, whereas Granisetron was over-dosed. Adherence rate to guideline in high and moderate and minimal emetic risk chemotherapy was 72.3%, 22.9% and 69.2% respectively. None of low emetic risk patients received guideline compliant prophylaxis. In all emetic risk levels, 50 (36.8%) patients received guideline adherent prophylaxis. Conclusion: As results indicated, adherence rate wasn’t optimal. Available dosage form of a medication has great impact on appropriate prescription. Thus, it is suggested for pharmaceutical companies to be informed about recent guidelines’ updates and subsequently produce proper dosage forms for different indications.

نویسندگان
hide/show

نویسنده نفر چندم مقاله
محمد محمدزادهاول
شهاب الدین هاتفیدوم
نازلی رشادیسوم
زهره صناعتچهارم
صبا غفاریپنجم

لینک دانلود مقاله
hide/show

نام فایل تاریخ درج فایل اندازه فایل دانلود
403-Article Text-1646-1-10-20210404.pdf1400/01/28711502دانلود