Comparison of Shear Bond Strength of Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer and Composite Resin to Three Pulp Capping Agents
Comparison of Shear Bond Strength of Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer and Composite Resin to Three Pulp Capping Agents
نویسندگان: امیر احمد عجمی , المیرا جعفری نویمی پور , سیاوش سوادی اسکویی , مهدی عابد کهنمویی , مهرداد لطفی , مهدی دانشپوی
کلمات کلیدی: Resin composite, resin-modified glass ionomer, MTA, shear bond strength
نشریه: 19913 , 3 , 7 , 2013
| نویسنده ثبت کننده مقاله |
المیرا جعفری نویمی پور |
| مرحله جاری مقاله |
تایید نهایی |
| دانشکده/مرکز مربوطه |
دانشکده دندانپزشکی |
| کد مقاله |
75295 |
| عنوان فارسی مقاله |
Comparison of Shear Bond Strength of Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer and Composite Resin to Three Pulp Capping Agents |
| عنوان لاتین مقاله |
Comparison of Shear Bond Strength of Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer and Composite Resin to Three Pulp Capping Agents |
| ناشر |
6 |
| آیا مقاله از طرح تحقیقاتی و یا منتورشیپ استخراج شده است؟ |
بلی |
| عنوان نشریه (خارج از لیست فوق) |
|
| نوع مقاله |
Original Article |
| نحوه ایندکس شدن مقاله |
ایندکس شده سطح دو – PubMed |
| آدرس لینک مقاله/ همایش در شبکه اینترنت |
|
| Background and aims. Present study was designed to compare the bonding strength of resin-modified glass ionomer
(RMGI) and composite resin to mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA), MTA mixed with Na2HPO4 (NAMTA), and calciumenriched mixture (CEM).
Materials and methods. Thirty specimens of each CEM, NAMTA, and MTA were prepared. Composite and RMGI
restorations were then placed on the samples (15 samples in six subgroups). Shear bond strength was assessed using universal testing machine. Data were analyzed with two-way ANOVA and post-hoc Tukey test. To compare the bond strength in
subgroups, one-away ANOVA was applied. Significance level was set at P < 0.05.
Results. Bond strength was significantly higher to composite samples compared to RMGI samples (p<0.001). The difference in bond strength of composite samples between MTA and CEM subgroups (P=0.026) as well as MTA and NAMTA
subgroups (P= 0.019) was significant, but the difference between NAMTA and CEM subgroups (P=0.56) was not significant. The differences in bond strength in subgroups of RMGI group were not significant (P>0.05).
Conclusion. Regarding shear bond strength to the tested substrates, composite was shown to be superior to RMGI. The
bond of resin composite to MTA was weaker than that to CEM and NAMTA. |
| نام فایل |
تاریخ درج فایل |
اندازه فایل |
دانلود |
| daneshpuy.pdf | 1399/12/11 | 178568 | دانلود |