Effect of zinc phosphate and non-eugenol temporary dental cement on different modification of abutment in implant restoration

Effect of zinc phosphate and non-eugenol temporary dental cement on different modification of abutment in implant restoration


چاپ صفحه
پژوهان
صفحه نخست سامانه
چکیده مقاله
چکیده مقاله
نویسندگان
نویسندگان
دانلود مقاله
دانلود مقاله
دانشگاه علوم پزشکی تبریز
دانشگاه علوم پزشکی تبریز

نویسندگان: رامین نگاهداری , علی تراب , شایان احمدی

کلمات کلیدی: Implant; retention rate; cemented implant prostheses

نشریه: 0 , 12 , 2 , 2020

اطلاعات کلی مقاله
hide/show

نویسنده ثبت کننده مقاله رامین نگاهداری
مرحله جاری مقاله تایید نهایی
دانشکده/مرکز مربوطه دانشکده دندانپزشکی
کد مقاله 74568
عنوان فارسی مقاله Effect of zinc phosphate and non-eugenol temporary dental cement on different modification of abutment in implant restoration
عنوان لاتین مقاله Effect of zinc phosphate and non-eugenol temporary dental cement on different modification of abutment in implant restoration
ناشر 3
آیا مقاله از طرح تحقیقاتی و یا منتورشیپ استخراج شده است؟ بلی
عنوان نشریه (خارج از لیست فوق) Eurasian Chemical Communications
نوع مقاله Original Article
نحوه ایندکس شدن مقاله ایندکس شده سطح یک – ISI - Web of Science
آدرس لینک مقاله/ همایش در شبکه اینترنت

خلاصه مقاله
hide/show

Fixed implant-dependent prostheses are one of the most common treatments in dentistry. The aim of this study was to test the impact of modifications of the implant-abutment body on the retention rate of the cemented implant prostheses. For this purpose, sixty-four DIO implants in 8 groups were used. The retention levels of permanent cements were greater than that of temporary cements. The highest retention rate was reported in the group of permanent cements in sandblast implants and then in double-vented and single-vented abutments and finally in the control group, but in the group of temporary cements, the lowest rate of retention was reported in double-vented and single-vented abutments and finally in the control group. In the group of temporary cements, like permanent partners, sandblast abutments had the highest retention. By creating architectural improvements in the body of the abutments, in addition to getting an appropriate amount of retention close to permanent cement clinically, the benefits of temporary cements such as their higher solubility and the avoidance of the possible dangers of the residual cements could be exploited.

نویسندگان
hide/show

نویسنده نفر چندم مقاله
رامین نگاهداریسوم
علی ترابدوم
شایان احمدیاول

لینک دانلود مقاله
hide/show

نام فایل تاریخ درج فایل اندازه فایل دانلود
ECC_Volume 2_Issue 12_Pages 1172-1182.pdf1399/09/171183089دانلود