Ramadan Fasting and Kidney Stones: A Systematic Review
Ramadan Fasting and Kidney Stones: A Systematic Review
نویسندگان: محسن امجدی زین الحاجلو , فرزین سلیمان زاده اردبیلی , حمیدرضا قامت زاده , سکینه حاج ابراهیمی , هانیه صالحی پورمهر , فاطمه طهماسبی , حسین حسینی فرد
کلمات کلیدی: Fasting; Kidney Calculi; Kidney Diseases; Systematic Review
نشریه: 34358 , 4 , 18 , 2020
| نویسنده ثبت کننده مقاله |
فرزین سلیمان زاده اردبیلی |
| مرحله جاری مقاله |
تایید نهایی |
| دانشکده/مرکز مربوطه |
مرکز تحقیقات پزشکی مبتنی بر شواهد EBM |
| کد مقاله |
74540 |
| عنوان فارسی مقاله |
Ramadan Fasting and Kidney Stones: A Systematic Review |
| عنوان لاتین مقاله |
Ramadan Fasting and Kidney Stones: A Systematic Review |
| ناشر |
7 |
| آیا مقاله از طرح تحقیقاتی و یا منتورشیپ استخراج شده است؟ |
بلی |
| عنوان نشریه (خارج از لیست فوق) |
|
| نوع مقاله |
Systematic Review Article |
| نحوه ایندکس شدن مقاله |
ایندکس شده سطح یک – ISI - Web of Science |
| آدرس لینک مقاله/ همایش در شبکه اینترنت |
|
| Purpose: Ramadan fasting in Muslims may contain several hours of abstaining from food and drinking in any kind. This can potentially increase the risk of urinary stone disease. Current literature on possible effects of Ramadan fasting on urolithiasis is rather limited. Having the gap in scientific background, we decided to evaluate the available comparative information in this systematic review.
Materials and Methods: We included all studies comparing fasting and non-fasting conditions, studies evaluating stone formation and clinical manifestations of kidney stone disease. All the English studies published from January 1980 to the end of 2019 were included. The exclusion criteria were as followed: fasting out of Ramadan, non-comparative studies, animal studies, patients with bladder stones and studies evaluating conditions that are only indirectly related to the stone formation or clinical manifestations of it. Applying the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodology for systematic review showed the quality of included studies was not high.
Results: Only five studies remained after exclusion. Meta-analysis was not applicable due to the diversity in methods and evaluated population.
Conclusion: Main trend of the included studies is toward showing no difference between fasting and non-fasting conditions in terms of renal stone formation. However, generalization of the findings to greater populations should be applied carefully considering the heterogeneity of results and quality of studies. |
| نام فایل |
تاریخ درج فایل |
اندازه فایل |
دانلود |
| 6373-Main Text-27519-2-10-20210920.pdf | 1400/07/04 | 690662 | دانلود |