Comparison of the Effect of Body Position, Prone or Supine, on the Result of Extracorpreal Shock Wave Lithotripsy in Patients with Stones in the Proximal Ureter

Comparison of the Effect of Body Position, Prone or Supine, on the Result of Extracorpreal Shock Wave Lithotripsy in Patients with Stones in the Proximal Ureter


چاپ صفحه
پژوهان
صفحه نخست سامانه
چکیده مقاله
چکیده مقاله
نویسندگان
نویسندگان
دانلود مقاله
دانلود مقاله
دانشگاه علوم پزشکی تبریز
دانشگاه علوم پزشکی تبریز

نویسندگان: افشار زمردی

کلمات کلیدی: Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy, Supine position, Prone position, Ureteric stone

نشریه: 30927 , 2 , 18 , 2007

اطلاعات کلی مقاله
hide/show

نویسنده ثبت کننده مقاله افشار زمردی
مرحله جاری مقاله تایید نهایی
دانشکده/مرکز مربوطه دانشکده پزشکی
کد مقاله 73910
عنوان فارسی مقاله Comparison of the Effect of Body Position, Prone or Supine, on the Result of Extracorpreal Shock Wave Lithotripsy in Patients with Stones in the Proximal Ureter
عنوان لاتین مقاله Comparison of the Effect of Body Position, Prone or Supine, on the Result of Extracorpreal Shock Wave Lithotripsy in Patients with Stones in the Proximal Ureter
ناشر 4
آیا مقاله از طرح تحقیقاتی و یا منتورشیپ استخراج شده است؟ بلی
عنوان نشریه (خارج از لیست فوق)
نوع مقاله Original Article
نحوه ایندکس شدن مقاله ایندکس شده سطح دو – PubMed
آدرس لینک مقاله/ همایش در شبکه اینترنت

خلاصه مقاله
hide/show

The aim of this study was to determine whether positioning of the patient, prone or supine, plays a significant role on the treatment of stones in the proximal ureter with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL). 68 patients with proximal ureteric stones underwent ESWL. The procedure was performed in the supine position in 35 (Group 1) and the prone position in 33 patients (Group 2). Stone-free rates, repeat ESWL rates, shocks per patient and shocks per session were compared in both groups. The mean session number per patient was 1.93 +/- 0.82 in Group 1 and 1.88 +/- 0.79 in Group 2 (P = 0.786). The stone-free rates, three months after ESWL, were 81.8% in Group 1 and 82.9% in Group 2 (P = or > 0.05). Thus, these two parameters were similar in both Groups. Also, the number of shocks per session was 3066.1 +/- 346.3 in Group 1 and 3148.5 +/- 621.0 in Group 2. This difference was nonsignificant (P = 0.49). Our study suggests that the treatment of proximal ureteric stones with ESWL in the prone position is as safe and effective as when the patient is placed in the supine position.

نویسندگان
hide/show

نویسنده نفر چندم مقاله
افشار زمردیاول

لینک دانلود مقاله
hide/show

نام فایل تاریخ درج فایل اندازه فایل دانلود
SaudiJKidneyDisTranspl182200-2648051_072120.pdf1399/07/14225358دانلود