Health Care Waste Management Improvement Interventions Specifications and Results: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Health Care Waste Management Improvement Interventions Specifications and Results: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis


چاپ صفحه
پژوهان
صفحه نخست سامانه
چکیده مقاله
چکیده مقاله
نویسندگان
نویسندگان
دانلود مقاله
دانلود مقاله
دانشگاه علوم پزشکی تبریز
دانشگاه علوم پزشکی تبریز

نویسندگان: صابر اعظمی-آغداش , جعفر صادق تبریزی , رامین رضاپور , محمد رشیدیان ملکی , علی اشتری

کلمات کلیدی: Health care waste management, Systematic review, Meta-analysis, Critical analysis, Interventions

نشریه: 16601 , 9 , 49 , 2020

اطلاعات کلی مقاله
hide/show

نویسنده ثبت کننده مقاله صابر اعظمی-آغداش
مرحله جاری مقاله تایید نهایی
دانشکده/مرکز مربوطه دانشکده مدیریت و اطلاع رسانی پزشکی
کد مقاله 73667
عنوان فارسی مقاله Health Care Waste Management Improvement Interventions Specifications and Results: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
عنوان لاتین مقاله Health Care Waste Management Improvement Interventions Specifications and Results: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
ناشر 5
آیا مقاله از طرح تحقیقاتی و یا منتورشیپ استخراج شده است؟ بلی
عنوان نشریه (خارج از لیست فوق)
نوع مقاله متاآنالیز
نحوه ایندکس شدن مقاله ایندکس شده سطح یک – ISI - Web of Science
آدرس لینک مقاله/ همایش در شبکه اینترنت

خلاصه مقاله
hide/show

Background: Given the importance of proper management of Health Care Waste Management (HCWM), comprehensive information on interventions in this field is necessary. Therefore, we aimed to systematically review and meta-analysis of characteristics and results of interventions in the field of HCWM. Methods: The required data were gathered through searching the keywords such as waste management, biomedical waste, hospitals waste, health care waste, infectious waste, medical waste, Waste Disposal Facilities, Garbage, Waste Disposal Facilities, Hazardous Waste Sites in PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, Google scholar, Cochrane library, Science Direct, web of knowledge, SID and MagIran and hand searching in journals, reference by reference, and search in Gray literatures between 2000 and 2019. CMA software: 2 (Comprehensive Meta-Analysis) was used to perform the meta-analysis. Results: Twenty-seven interventions were evaluated. Most of the studies were conducted after 2010, in the form of pre and post study, without control group, and in hospital. Interventions were divided into two categories: educational interventions (19 studies) and multifaceted managerial interventions (8 studies). The most studied outcome (in 11 studies) was KAP (knowledge, attitude and practice). The mean standard difference of interventions on KAP was estimated 3.04 (2.54–3.54) which was significant statistically (P<0.05). Also, interventions were considerably effective in improving the indicators of waste production amount, waste management costs and overall waste management performance. Conclusion: Despite positive effect of interventions, due to the methodological deficiencies of published studies and high heterogeneity in results of studies, caution should be exercised in interpreting and using the results of the studies.

نویسندگان
hide/show

نویسنده نفر چندم مقاله
صابر اعظمی-آغداشپنجم
جعفر صادق تبریزیدوم
رامین رضاپورسوم
محمد رشیدیان ملکیچهارم
علی اشتریاول

لینک دانلود مقاله
hide/show

نام فایل تاریخ درج فایل اندازه فایل دانلود
19187-Article Text-55545-1-10-20200823 (4).pdf1399/07/071182050دانلود