Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review


چاپ صفحه
پژوهان
صفحه نخست سامانه
چکیده مقاله
چکیده مقاله
نویسندگان
نویسندگان
دانلود مقاله
دانلود مقاله
دانشگاه علوم پزشکی تبریز
دانشگاه علوم پزشکی تبریز

نویسندگان: فرهاد خلیلی گشت رودخانی , بهزاد نجفی , محمود یوسفی

کلمات کلیدی: incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, screening techniques, economic evaluation, colorectal cancer

نشریه: 30566 , 2020 , 13 , 2020

اطلاعات کلی مقاله
hide/show

نویسنده ثبت کننده مقاله محمود یوسفی
مرحله جاری مقاله تایید نهایی
دانشکده/مرکز مربوطه دانشکده مدیریت و اطلاع رسانی پزشکی
کد مقاله 73500
عنوان فارسی مقاله Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review
عنوان لاتین مقاله Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review
ناشر 6
آیا مقاله از طرح تحقیقاتی و یا منتورشیپ استخراج شده است؟ بلی
عنوان نشریه (خارج از لیست فوق)
نوع مقاله Systematic Review Article
نحوه ایندکس شدن مقاله ایندکس شده سطح یک – ISI - Web of Science
آدرس لینک مقاله/ همایش در شبکه اینترنت

خلاصه مقاله
hide/show

Introduction: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a significant health problem with an increasing incidence worldwide. Screening is one of the ways, in which cases and deaths of CRC can be prevented. The objective of this systematic review was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of the different CRC screening techniques and to specify the efficient technique from a costeffectiveness perspective. Methods: The economic studies of CRC screening in general populations (average risk), aged 50 years and above were reviewed. Two reviewers independently reviewed the titles, abstracts, and full-texts of the studies in five databases: Cochrane, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science and PubMed. The disagreements between reviewers were resolved through the authors’ consensus. The main outcome measures in this systematic review were the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of screening versus no-screening and then in comparison with other screening techniques. The ICER is defined by the difference in cost between two possible interventions, divided by the difference in their effect. Results: Eight studies were identified and retained for the final analysis. In this study, when screening techniques were compared to no-screening, all CRC screening techniques showed to be cost-effective. The lowest ICER calculated was $PPP −16265/quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) (the negative ICERs were between purchasing power parity in US dollar ($PPP) −16265/QALY to $PPP −1988/QALY, whereas the positive ICERs were between $PPP 1257/ QALY to $PPP 55987/QALY). For studies comparing various screening techniques, there was great heterogeneity in terms of the structures of the analyses, leading to diverse conclusions about their incremental cost-effectiveness. Conclusion: All CRC screening techniques were cost-effective, compared with the noscreening methods. The cost-effectiveness of the various screening techniques mainly was dependent on the context-specific parameters and highly affected by the framework of the cost-effectiveness analysis. In order to make the studies comparable, it is important to adopt a reference-based methodology for economic evaluation studies.

نویسندگان
hide/show

نویسنده نفر چندم مقاله
فرهاد خلیلی گشت رودخانیاول
بهزاد نجفیدوم
محمود یوسفیچهارم

لینک دانلود مقاله
hide/show

نام فایل تاریخ درج فایل اندازه فایل دانلود
rmhp-262171-cost-effectiveness-analysis-of-colorectal-cancer-screening-.pdf1399/06/20578073دانلود