چاپ صفحه |  صفحه نخست سامانه |  چکیده مقاله |  نویسندگان |  دانلود مقاله | دانشگاه علوم پزشکی تبریز |
| WereadthereportbyHronetal1comparing blender-ized formulas and conventional formulas in terms ofhealth outcomes in children. The study was designed asa longitudinal cohort study; however, there were no sta-tistical analyses or reporting of tailored effect size speci-fied for cohort studies. The authors confined thestatistical analysis to attest to report differences in 2groups, but the cohort studies are a subgroup of analyt-ical studies, and reporting of effect estimates seems valu-able in such studies. There are 3 types of effect estimatesfor within-study comparisons: relative risk (RR), hazardratio, and OR consideringthe outcomes assessed.2Theconclusions from attest between scores of 2 groups(the authors’ Table V) may be unreliable, because attest is unable to determine the degree of the relationship,and in this test the roles of outcome and risk factors arereversed. To specify the beneficial effect of blenderizedformulas, RR with 95% CI after adjusting for confound-ing variables should have been reported. In addition,the authors did not mention the eligibility criteria forthe study and did not explain how the sample size wascalculated or how missing data were addressed. |
| نویسنده | نفر چندم مقاله |
|---|---|
| علی طریقت اسفنجانی | سوم |
| مهرانگیز ابراهیمی ممقانی | پنجم |
| محمد اصغری جعفرآبادی | دوم |
| میثم زارع زاده | اول |
| مریم نوری | چهارم |
| نام فایل | تاریخ درج فایل | اندازه فایل | دانلود |
|---|---|---|---|
| PIIS002234762030144X.pdf | 1399/05/22 | 189740 | دانلود |
