Treatment of ureteral stones: A prospective randomized controlled trial on comparison of Ho: YAG laser and pneumatic lithotripsy
Treatment of ureteral stones: A prospective randomized controlled trial on comparison of Ho: YAG laser and pneumatic lithotripsy
نویسندگان: محسن امجدی زین الحاجلو
کلمات کلیدی: Ho: YAG laser, pneumatic lithotripsy, ureteral stones
نشریه: 14723 , 3 , 24 , 2008
| نویسنده ثبت کننده مقاله |
محسن امجدی زین الحاجلو |
| مرحله جاری مقاله |
تایید نهایی |
| دانشکده/مرکز مربوطه |
دانشکده پزشکی |
| کد مقاله |
73054 |
| عنوان فارسی مقاله |
Treatment of ureteral stones: A prospective randomized controlled trial on comparison of Ho: YAG laser and pneumatic lithotripsy |
| عنوان لاتین مقاله |
Treatment of ureteral stones: A prospective randomized controlled trial on comparison of Ho: YAG laser and pneumatic lithotripsy |
| ناشر |
4 |
| آیا مقاله از طرح تحقیقاتی و یا منتورشیپ استخراج شده است؟ |
خیر |
| عنوان نشریه (خارج از لیست فوق) |
|
| نوع مقاله |
Original Article |
| نحوه ایندکس شدن مقاله |
ایندکس شده سطح دو – PubMed |
| آدرس لینک مقاله/ همایش در شبکه اینترنت |
|
| Objectives:
To study the treatment of ureteric stones by HO:YAG laser lithotripsy and pneumatic lithotripsy and to evaluate the results of the two treatment modalities to assess effectiveness and complications.
Materials and Methods:
Over 1-year period, a total of 79 patients with 82 ureteral stones were randomized into two groups. In group 1 (39 cases with 41 ureteral stones) ureteroscopic HO:YAG laser lithotripsy was performed using a rigid 8 Fr-ureteroscope (LL group). In group 2 (40 cases with 41 ureteral stones) pneumatic lithotripsy was performed in like manner. Efficacy safety and complications in both groups were analyzed.
Results:
A total of 79 patients with 82 calculi were treated. Two cases in LL group and one in PL group had bilateral ureteral stones. Mean stone size was 12.07 mm in LL group and 10.2 mm in PL group. Stones located in lower ureter in 30 cases on LL group and 29 cases in PL group. Proximal migration of stone occurred in 1 case on LL group and in 3 cases on PL group. Successful fragmentation occurred in 37 cases on LL group and in 30 cases on PL group. Stone-free rate after 1 month in the base of Kidney Ureter Bladder (KUB) and sonography was 95% in LL group and 80.5% in PL group. Ureteral perforation, urinoma, and urosepsis were not seen in both groups.
Conclusion:
HO:YAG laser has advantages over PL in high efficacy of stone fragmentation and a low-retrograde migration of ureteral stone treatment. Other complication of ureteral stone treatment with LL and PL are the same and very rare. |
| نام فایل |
تاریخ درج فایل |
اندازه فایل |
دانلود |
| Treatment_of_ureteral_stones_.pdf | 1399/05/13 | 71494 | دانلود |