Treatment of ureteral stones: A prospective randomized controlled trial on comparison of Ho: YAG laser and pneumatic lithotripsy

Treatment of ureteral stones: A prospective randomized controlled trial on comparison of Ho: YAG laser and pneumatic lithotripsy


چاپ صفحه
پژوهان
صفحه نخست سامانه
چکیده مقاله
چکیده مقاله
نویسندگان
نویسندگان
دانلود مقاله
دانلود مقاله
دانشگاه علوم پزشکی تبریز
دانشگاه علوم پزشکی تبریز

نویسندگان: محسن امجدی زین الحاجلو

کلمات کلیدی: Ho: YAG laser, pneumatic lithotripsy, ureteral stones

نشریه: 14723 , 3 , 24 , 2008

اطلاعات کلی مقاله
hide/show

نویسنده ثبت کننده مقاله محسن امجدی زین الحاجلو
مرحله جاری مقاله تایید نهایی
دانشکده/مرکز مربوطه دانشکده پزشکی
کد مقاله 73054
عنوان فارسی مقاله Treatment of ureteral stones: A prospective randomized controlled trial on comparison of Ho: YAG laser and pneumatic lithotripsy
عنوان لاتین مقاله Treatment of ureteral stones: A prospective randomized controlled trial on comparison of Ho: YAG laser and pneumatic lithotripsy
ناشر 4
آیا مقاله از طرح تحقیقاتی و یا منتورشیپ استخراج شده است؟ خیر
عنوان نشریه (خارج از لیست فوق)
نوع مقاله Original Article
نحوه ایندکس شدن مقاله ایندکس شده سطح دو – PubMed
آدرس لینک مقاله/ همایش در شبکه اینترنت

خلاصه مقاله
hide/show

Objectives: To study the treatment of ureteric stones by HO:YAG laser lithotripsy and pneumatic lithotripsy and to evaluate the results of the two treatment modalities to assess effectiveness and complications. Materials and Methods: Over 1-year period, a total of 79 patients with 82 ureteral stones were randomized into two groups. In group 1 (39 cases with 41 ureteral stones) ureteroscopic HO:YAG laser lithotripsy was performed using a rigid 8 Fr-ureteroscope (LL group). In group 2 (40 cases with 41 ureteral stones) pneumatic lithotripsy was performed in like manner. Efficacy safety and complications in both groups were analyzed. Results: A total of 79 patients with 82 calculi were treated. Two cases in LL group and one in PL group had bilateral ureteral stones. Mean stone size was 12.07 mm in LL group and 10.2 mm in PL group. Stones located in lower ureter in 30 cases on LL group and 29 cases in PL group. Proximal migration of stone occurred in 1 case on LL group and in 3 cases on PL group. Successful fragmentation occurred in 37 cases on LL group and in 30 cases on PL group. Stone-free rate after 1 month in the base of Kidney Ureter Bladder (KUB) and sonography was 95% in LL group and 80.5% in PL group. Ureteral perforation, urinoma, and urosepsis were not seen in both groups. Conclusion: HO:YAG laser has advantages over PL in high efficacy of stone fragmentation and a low-retrograde migration of ureteral stone treatment. Other complication of ureteral stone treatment with LL and PL are the same and very rare.

نویسندگان
hide/show

نویسنده نفر چندم مقاله
محسن امجدی زین الحاجلودوم

لینک دانلود مقاله
hide/show

نام فایل تاریخ درج فایل اندازه فایل دانلود
Treatment_of_ureteral_stones_.pdf1399/05/1371494دانلود