چاپ صفحه |  صفحه نخست سامانه |  چکیده مقاله |  نویسندگان |  دانلود مقاله | دانشگاه علوم پزشکی تبریز |
| Background: Nasogastric tube (NGT) insertion is one of the most common procedures in the Emergency Department (EDs). Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the ease of NGT installation using the conventional method and the SORT method. Methods: We conducted a randomized clinical trial in a university hospital on 200 patientswho required NGT insertion during MarSep, 2019. The patients were randomly divided into two groups of 100 patients each, receiving the SORT and conventional methods. Finally, the feasibility of NGT insertion was examined in the two groups using the frequency of NGT insertion attempts, pain during insertion (based on the VAS score of 1 - 10), patient satisfaction with the procedure (rating of 1 - 10), and incidence of complications. Results: There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of age, body mass index, sex, and history of NGT use. However, the mean patient satisfaction score was higher (P < 0.05), whereas the mean pain score was lower (P < 0.05) in the group receiving the conventional method compared to the other group. Moreover, there was no statistically significant difference in complications (P > 0.05). Conclusions: The study showed that using the conventional method in comparison with the SORT method was significantly better for NGT insertion in conscious patients in terms of patient satisfaction and pain relief. Therefore, it is recommended not to use the SORT method in conscious patients. |
| نویسنده | نفر چندم مقاله |
|---|---|
| حامد افشارجو | اول |
| عطا محمودپور | دوم |
| کاووس شهسواری نیا | سوم |
| فرزاد رحمانی | چهارم |
| نام فایل | تاریخ درج فایل | اندازه فایل | دانلود |
|---|---|---|---|
| aapm-10-3-103747.pdf | 1399/04/05 | 117729 | دانلود |
