Developing Performance Indicators for Trauma Care: A Four-Stage Qualitative Study

Developing Performance Indicators for Trauma Care: A Four-Stage Qualitative Study


چاپ صفحه
پژوهان
صفحه نخست سامانه
چکیده مقاله
چکیده مقاله
نویسندگان
نویسندگان
دانلود مقاله
دانلود مقاله
دانشگاه علوم پزشکی تبریز
دانشگاه علوم پزشکی تبریز

نویسندگان: یلدا موسی زاده , همایون صادقی بازرگانی , علی جنتی , محبوب پورآقائی

کلمات کلیدی: Trauma Care Performance Indicators Hospital

نشریه: 33898 , 1 , 25 , 2020

اطلاعات کلی مقاله
hide/show

نویسنده ثبت کننده مقاله علی جنتی
مرحله جاری مقاله تایید نهایی
دانشکده/مرکز مربوطه دانشکده مدیریت و اطلاع رسانی پزشکی
کد مقاله 72054
عنوان فارسی مقاله Developing Performance Indicators for Trauma Care: A Four-Stage Qualitative Study
عنوان لاتین مقاله Developing Performance Indicators for Trauma Care: A Four-Stage Qualitative Study
ناشر 4
آیا مقاله از طرح تحقیقاتی و یا منتورشیپ استخراج شده است؟ بلی
عنوان نشریه (خارج از لیست فوق)
نوع مقاله Original Article
نحوه ایندکس شدن مقاله ایندکس شده سطح یک – ISI - Web of Science
آدرس لینک مقاله/ همایش در شبکه اینترنت

خلاصه مقاله
hide/show

Background: Trauma is considered one of the major causes of death around the world. Increased costs of healthcare and differences in the quality of services among trauma centers indicate that measuring the performance of trauma care is necessary. Objectives: the present study aimed to develop some trauma care performance indicators. Methods: This study was implemented between September 2017 and October 2018 in a four-stage process: a comprehensive literature review, sessions with a panel of five experts, two focus group discussions, sixteen semi-structured interviews, and a two-round Delphi survey. The study setting was East Azerbaijan province, Iran. Forty-six experts in different fields of medical sciences confirmed applicable indicators for trauma care assessment. Results: A total of 140 indicators were found through a comprehensive literature review. After conducting expert panels, focus group discussions, and interviews, the number of indicators decreased to 57 cases and were entered into the Delphi survey. In the first phase of the Delphi survey, content validity ratio (CVR), content validity indicator (CVI), and modified kappa values were 0.64, 0.85, and 0.83, respectively. Sixteen indicators were changed or deleted and 6 indicators were separated. The members of the final expert panel agreed on 50 indicators in the second phase of the Delphi survey after omitting 7 indicators. Conclusion: Performanceindicators for trauma care evaluation were introduced in this study. They can be used by policymakers and health service providers to assess and improve performance and compare trauma centers in Iran and developing countries that have health systems similar to the Iranian health system.

نویسندگان
hide/show

نویسنده نفر چندم مقاله
یلدا موسی زادهاول
همایون صادقی بازرگانیدوم
علی جنتیسوم
محبوب پورآقائیچهارم

لینک دانلود مقاله
hide/show

نام فایل تاریخ درج فایل اندازه فایل دانلود
mousazadeh.pdf1399/02/094961226دانلود