Effect of SubhypnoticDosesof Propofol and Midazolam for Nausea and Vomiting DuringSpinal Anesthesia for Caesarean Section

Effect of SubhypnoticDosesof Propofol and Midazolam for Nausea and Vomiting DuringSpinal Anesthesia for Caesarean Section


چاپ صفحه
پژوهان
صفحه نخست سامانه
چکیده مقاله
چکیده مقاله
نویسندگان
نویسندگان
دانلود مقاله
دانلود مقاله
دانشگاه علوم پزشکی تبریز
دانشگاه علوم پزشکی تبریز

نویسندگان: سوسن رسولی , فرناز مسلمی , آرش خاکی

کلمات کلیدی: Propofol; Midazolam; Nausea; Vomiting; Cesarean section

نشریه: 2102 , 4 , 4 , 2014

اطلاعات کلی مقاله
hide/show

نویسنده ثبت کننده مقاله فرناز مسلمی
مرحله جاری مقاله تایید نهایی
دانشکده/مرکز مربوطه سلامت باروری زنان
کد مقاله 72043
عنوان فارسی مقاله Effect of SubhypnoticDosesof Propofol and Midazolam for Nausea and Vomiting DuringSpinal Anesthesia for Caesarean Section
عنوان لاتین مقاله Effect of SubhypnoticDosesof Propofol and Midazolam for Nausea and Vomiting DuringSpinal Anesthesia for Caesarean Section
ناشر 3
آیا مقاله از طرح تحقیقاتی و یا منتورشیپ استخراج شده است؟ خیر
عنوان نشریه (خارج از لیست فوق)
نوع مقاله Original Article
نحوه ایندکس شدن مقاله ایندکس شده سطح دو – PubMed
آدرس لینک مقاله/ همایش در شبکه اینترنت

خلاصه مقاله
hide/show

Background: Spinal anesthesia has been associated with intraoperative nausea and vomiting (IONV), especially during cesarean section, which is attributed to several mechanisms. Objectives: In the present study, therapeutic and preventive properties of subhypnoticdosemidazolam and propofol and their effects on the occurrence and severity of intraoperative nausea and vomiting during elective cesarean section under spinal anesthesia were evaluated. Patients and Methods: In a randomized, double-blind, and placebo-controlled clinical trial, 90 parturients, ASA class I and II, aged 20-30 years, who undergone spinal anesthesia for cesarean section were randomly allocated to one of three groups receiving midazolam (1 mg bolus and 0.1mg/kg/hr, n=30), propofol (20 mg bolus and 0.1 mg/kg/hr, n = 30), and placebo (saline, n=30) intravenously (IV) immediately after umbilical cord clamping. Bupivacaine hydrochloride (10 mg) was used for induction of the anesthesia. Patients’ hemodynamics was monitored at 3-minute intervals. Furthermore, intraoperative and post-delivery emetic episodes, severity of emesis, scores of sedation and ephedrine consumption were recorded. Results: The incidence of nausea, retching, and vomiting was significantly higher in the control group compared topropofol and midazolam groups. Overall, PONV (postoperative nausea and vomiting) in midazolam group was as low as propofol group without any significant hemodynamic changes as seen in placebo group or even with propofol group. Conclusions: Subhypnotic doses of midazolam or propofolare effective in the prevention of nausea and vomiting during and after cesarean section with spinal anesthesia and does not significantlyinfluence hemodynamic of the patients.

نویسندگان
hide/show

نویسنده نفر چندم مقاله
سوسن رسولیاول
فرناز مسلمیدوم
آرش خاکیسوم

لینک دانلود مقاله
hide/show

نام فایل تاریخ درج فایل اندازه فایل دانلود
aapm-04-04-19384.pdf1399/02/0977271دانلود