Formocresol versus calcium hydroxide direct pulp capping of human primary molars: two year follow-up

Formocresol versus calcium hydroxide direct pulp capping of human primary molars: two year follow-up


چاپ صفحه
پژوهان
صفحه نخست سامانه
چکیده مقاله
چکیده مقاله
نویسندگان
نویسندگان
دانلود مقاله
دانلود مقاله
دانشگاه علوم پزشکی تبریز
دانشگاه علوم پزشکی تبریز

نویسندگان: ناصر اصل امین آبادی , سینا قرطاسی اسکوئی

کلمات کلیدی: Calcium hydroxide, direct pulp capping, formocresol, primary molar.

نشریه: 17233 , 4 , 34 , 2010

اطلاعات کلی مقاله
hide/show

نویسنده ثبت کننده مقاله ناصر اصل امین آبادی
مرحله جاری مقاله تایید نهایی
دانشکده/مرکز مربوطه دانشکده دندانپزشکی
کد مقاله 71760
عنوان فارسی مقاله Formocresol versus calcium hydroxide direct pulp capping of human primary molars: two year follow-up
عنوان لاتین مقاله Formocresol versus calcium hydroxide direct pulp capping of human primary molars: two year follow-up
ناشر 3
آیا مقاله از طرح تحقیقاتی و یا منتورشیپ استخراج شده است؟ خیر
عنوان نشریه (خارج از لیست فوق)
نوع مقاله Original Article
نحوه ایندکس شدن مقاله ایندکس شده سطح یک – ISI - Web of Science
آدرس لینک مقاله/ همایش در شبکه اینترنت

خلاصه مقاله
hide/show

Objectives: Clinical and radiographic evaluation of the premedicated direct pulp capping using formocresol (PDC) versus conventional direct pulp capping using calcium hydroxide (CDC) in human carious primary molars. Study design: A total of 120 vital primary molars with pinpoint exposure during caries removal in 84 patients aged 4-5 years were selected. In the PDC group (n = 60), 20% Buckley’s formocresol solution, and in the CDC group (n = 60), calcium hydroxide powder were applied to the exposure sites followed by placement of zinc oxide-eugenol base. Teeth were restored with preformed stainless steel crowns. Clinical and radiographic evaluations of the treatment outcomes were performed at regular intervals of 6 and 12 months, respectively, for two years post-operatively. Results: The prevalence of spontaneous pain, sensitivity on percussion, and fistula were significantly higher in the CDC group compared to the PDC group (P < 0.05). The number of teeth exhibiting periapical/furcal radiolucency or external/internal root resorption was also higher in the CDC group (P < 0.05). The clinical success rate of the PDC was 90% compared to the 61.7% of the CDC (P < 0.05). The radiographic success rates of the PDC and CDC groups were 85% and 53.3%, respectively (P < 0.05). Conclusion: It seems formocresol premedicated direct pulp capping could safely be used as a substitute for conventional direct pulp capping.

نویسندگان
hide/show

نویسنده نفر چندم مقاله
ناصر اصل امین آبادیاول
سینا قرطاسی اسکوئیسوم

لینک دانلود مقاله
hide/show

نام فایل تاریخ درج فایل اندازه فایل دانلود
Formocresol versus calcium hydroxide direct pulp capping of human primary molars two year follow-up.pdf1399/01/29104050دانلود