The Effects of Peritoneal Dialysis Catheter Insertion Using Paramedian Versus Midline Approach on Children

The Effects of Peritoneal Dialysis Catheter Insertion Using Paramedian Versus Midline Approach on Children


چاپ صفحه
پژوهان
صفحه نخست سامانه
چکیده مقاله
چکیده مقاله
نویسندگان
نویسندگان
دانلود مقاله
دانلود مقاله
دانشگاه علوم پزشکی تبریز
دانشگاه علوم پزشکی تبریز

نویسندگان: مسعود جمشیدی , داود بادبرین , امیر اسدلو , سید احسان موسوی تومتری

کلمات کلیدی: Peritoneal dialysis; catheter insertion; para-median, midline

نشریه: 0 , 2 , 42 , 2020

اطلاعات کلی مقاله
hide/show

نویسنده ثبت کننده مقاله مسعود جمشیدی
مرحله جاری مقاله تایید نهایی
دانشکده/مرکز مربوطه دانشکده پزشکی
کد مقاله 71706
عنوان فارسی مقاله The Effects of Peritoneal Dialysis Catheter Insertion Using Paramedian Versus Midline Approach on Children
عنوان لاتین مقاله The Effects of Peritoneal Dialysis Catheter Insertion Using Paramedian Versus Midline Approach on Children
ناشر 5
آیا مقاله از طرح تحقیقاتی و یا منتورشیپ استخراج شده است؟ بلی
عنوان نشریه (خارج از لیست فوق) Erciyes Medical Journal
نوع مقاله Original Article
نحوه ایندکس شدن مقاله ایندکس شده سطح یک – ISI - Web of Science
آدرس لینک مقاله/ همایش در شبکه اینترنت

خلاصه مقاله
hide/show

Objective: There are several methods for dialysis in children with chronic renal failure. One of the methods is the insertion of a peritoneal dialysis (PD) catheter, which can be embedded with para-median and midline approaches. In this study, we aim to compare the complications and the success rate of these two approaches. Materials and Methods: In this retrospective study, 41 patients under seven years who had undergone PD due to renal failure were included in this study. PD catheter was inserted via the paramedian approach in 15 and midline approach in 26 cases. Any early or late complications, as well as success rate, were compared between two approaches. Results: Paramedian compared to midline approach had a significantly lower rate of catheter obstruction (20% vs. 53.8%, p=0.03), leakage (13.3% vs. 46.2%, p=0.03) and local infection (13.3% vs. 50%, p=0.02) from early complications and lower rate of late fluid leakage (13.3% vs. 46.2%, p=0.03) and tunnel or exit site infection (6.7% vs. 38.5%, p=0.02) from late complications. The paramedian approach had a significantly higher rate of success (80% vs. 42.3%, p=0.02). Conclusion: Paramedian is a better approach for PD catheter insertion due to lower early and late complications, as well as a higher success rate.

نویسندگان
hide/show

نویسنده نفر چندم مقاله
مسعود جمشیدیاول
داود بادبریندوم
امیر اسدلوسوم
سید احسان موسوی تومتریپنجم

لینک دانلود مقاله
hide/show

نام فایل تاریخ درج فایل اندازه فایل دانلود
The Effects of Peritoneal Dialysis Catheter.pdf1399/01/26172429دانلود
az4m2pek4da9c4.pdf1399/02/16583995دانلود