Medical visit time and predictors in health facilities: a mega systematic review and meta-analysis

Medical visit time and predictors in health facilities: a mega systematic review and meta-analysis


چاپ صفحه
پژوهان
صفحه نخست سامانه
چکیده مقاله
چکیده مقاله
نویسندگان
نویسندگان
دانلود مقاله
دانلود مقاله
دانشگاه علوم پزشکی تبریز
دانشگاه علوم پزشکی تبریز

نویسندگان: سکینه حاج ابراهیمی , علی جنتی , مبین سخنور , ادریس حسن پور

کلمات کلیدی: Patient–physician relationship, Patients’ rights, Consultation length, Visit time

نشریه: 0 , 5 , 12 , 2019

اطلاعات کلی مقاله
hide/show

نویسنده ثبت کننده مقاله علی جنتی
مرحله جاری مقاله تایید نهایی
دانشکده/مرکز مربوطه دانشکده مدیریت و اطلاع رسانی پزشکی
کد مقاله 70030
عنوان فارسی مقاله Medical visit time and predictors in health facilities: a mega systematic review and meta-analysis
عنوان لاتین مقاله Medical visit time and predictors in health facilities: a mega systematic review and meta-analysis
ناشر 8
آیا مقاله از طرح تحقیقاتی و یا منتورشیپ استخراج شده است؟ خیر
عنوان نشریه (خارج از لیست فوق) INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HUMAN RIGHTS IN HEALTHCARE
نوع مقاله متاآنالیز
نحوه ایندکس شدن مقاله ایندکس شده سطح سه – Scopus
آدرس لینک مقاله/ همایش در شبکه اینترنت

خلاصه مقاله
hide/show

Purpose Visit time is a crucial aspect of patient–physician interaction; its inadequacy can negatively impact the efficiency of treatment and diagnosis. In addition, visit time is a fundamental demand of patients, and it is one of the rights of every patient. The purpose of this paper is to determine factors influencing the consultation length of physicians and to compare consultation length in different countries. Design/methodology/approach MEDLINE (PubMed), Web of Science, Cochrane, ProQuest, Scopus, and Google Scholar were searched. In addition, references of references were checked, and publication lists of individual scholars in the field were examined. We used data sources up to June 2018, without language restriction. We used a random-effects model for the meta-analyses. Meta-analyses were conducted using Comprehensive Meta-Analysis Version (CMA) 3.0. Findings Of 16,911 identified studies, 189 studies were assessed of which 125 cases (67 percent) have been conducted in the USA. A total of 189 studies, 164 (86.77 percent) involved face-to face-consultations. The effects of three variables, physician gender, patient gender, and type of consultation were analyzed. According to moderate and strong evidence studies, no significant difference was found in the consultation lengths of female and male doctors (Q=42.72, df=8, I2=81.27, p=0.891) and patients’ gender (Q=55.98, df=11, I2=80.35, p=0.314). In addition, no significant difference was found in the telemedicine or face-to-face visits (Q=41.25, df=5, I2=87.88, p=0.170). Originality/value In this systematic review and meta-analysis, all of physicians’ visits in 34 countries were surveyed. The evidence suggests that specified variables do not influence the length of consultations. Good relationship is essential to a safe and high-quality consultation and referral process. A high-quality consultation can improve decisions and quality of visits, treatment effectiveness, efficiency of service, quality of care, patient safety and physician and patient satisfaction.

نویسندگان
hide/show

نویسنده نفر چندم مقاله
سکینه حاج ابراهیمیاول
علی جنتیدوم
مبین سخنورچهارم
ادریس حسن پورهفتم

لینک دانلود مقاله
hide/show

نام فایل تاریخ درج فایل اندازه فایل دانلود
10-1108_IJHRH-05-2019-0036.pdf1398/09/06612830دانلود