Comparative Outcome of Different Types of Redo Surgery in Malfunction of Mechanical Prosthetic Mitral Valve

Comparative Outcome of Different Types of Redo Surgery in Malfunction of Mechanical Prosthetic Mitral Valve


چاپ صفحه
پژوهان
صفحه نخست سامانه
چکیده مقاله
چکیده مقاله
نویسندگان
نویسندگان
دانلود مقاله
دانلود مقاله
دانشگاه علوم پزشکی تبریز
دانشگاه علوم پزشکی تبریز

نویسندگان: ناصر خضرلو ی اقدم , بابک نصیری , رضایت پرویزی , محمد رضا تابان صادقی , ساناز موسوی

کلمات کلیدی: Cardiac valve prosthesis, Heart valve prosthesis implantation, Bioprostheses

نشریه: 0 , 4 , 6 , 2019

اطلاعات کلی مقاله
hide/show

نویسنده ثبت کننده مقاله ناصر خضرلو ی اقدم
مرحله جاری مقاله تایید نهایی
دانشکده/مرکز مربوطه مرکز تحقیقات قلب وعروق
کد مقاله 70021
عنوان فارسی مقاله Comparative Outcome of Different Types of Redo Surgery in Malfunction of Mechanical Prosthetic Mitral Valve
عنوان لاتین مقاله Comparative Outcome of Different Types of Redo Surgery in Malfunction of Mechanical Prosthetic Mitral Valve
ناشر 6
آیا مقاله از طرح تحقیقاتی و یا منتورشیپ استخراج شده است؟ بلی
عنوان نشریه (خارج از لیست فوق) Crescent Journal of Medical and Biological Sciences
نوع مقاله Original Article
نحوه ایندکس شدن مقاله ایندکس شده سطح یک – ISI - Web of Science
آدرس لینک مقاله/ همایش در شبکه اینترنت

خلاصه مقاله
hide/show

Objectives: Redo mitral valve replacement (MVR) is an important therapeutic approach in patients with the malfunction of the prosthetic mitral valve, especially in patients with severe dyspnea or a large thrombus burden. Redo replacement (MVR) and thrombectomy are different surgical approaches in these patients. This study evaluated the outcome of the second mitral valve surgery including mechanical MVR (M-MVR), biologic MVR (B-MVR), and surgical thrombectomy. Materials and Methods: To this end, 71 patients were included in this study, who underwent second mitral valve surgery following the malfunction of the prosthetic mitral valve in the last 10 years. These patients were divided into M-MVR, B-MVR, and surgical thrombectomy groups and their demographic, clinical, echocardiographic, and laboratory findings were gathered as well. Then, the patients were evaluated for their third MV surgery if it was performed, followed by evaluating the pump time and cross-clamp time Results: Fifty-seven, 8, and 6 patients underwent M-MVR, B-MVR, and thrombectomy, respectively. Based on the results, the mortality rate was not significantly different between the 3 groups ( P = 0.059). In addition, 12 patients underwent the third surgery with the highest (100%) and lowest (0%) rates at thrombectomy and B-MVR groups, respectively. Higher pump time and cross-clamp time were significantly associated with an increased mortality rate (P = 0.014 and P = 0.026, respectively). Conclusions: In the malfunction of the prosthetic mitral valve, mortality rate failed to significantly differ between the patients undergoing M-MVR, B-MVR, and thrombectomy but third surgery is often needed after thrombectomy. It seems that the replacement of previous prosthetic valve with a new mechanical or biological valve yields better results in the case of prosthetic valve malfunction

نویسندگان
hide/show

نویسنده نفر چندم مقاله
ناصر خضرلو ی اقدمدوم
بابک نصیریاول
رضایت پرویزیسوم
محمد رضا تابان صادقیچهارم
ساناز موسویپنجم

لینک دانلود مقاله
hide/show

نام فایل تاریخ درج فایل اندازه فایل دانلود
naser.pdf1398/09/05232582دانلود