Tubal ligation and endometrial Cancer risk: a global systematic review and meta-analysis.

Tubal ligation and endometrial Cancer risk: a global systematic review and meta-analysis.


چاپ صفحه
پژوهان
صفحه نخست سامانه
چکیده مقاله
چکیده مقاله
نویسندگان
نویسندگان
دانلود مقاله
دانلود مقاله
دانشگاه علوم پزشکی تبریز
دانشگاه علوم پزشکی تبریز

نویسندگان: سعید صفیری

کلمات کلیدی: Endometrial neoplasms; Meta-analysis; Tubal ligation; Tubal sterilization

نشریه: 4946 , 1 , 19 , 2019

اطلاعات کلی مقاله
hide/show

نویسنده ثبت کننده مقاله سعید صفیری
مرحله جاری مقاله تایید نهایی
دانشکده/مرکز مربوطه معاونت ها و پژوهشکده های دانشگاه
کد مقاله 69418
عنوان فارسی مقاله Tubal ligation and endometrial Cancer risk: a global systematic review and meta-analysis.
عنوان لاتین مقاله Tubal ligation and endometrial Cancer risk: a global systematic review and meta-analysis.
ناشر 10
آیا مقاله از طرح تحقیقاتی و یا منتورشیپ استخراج شده است؟
عنوان نشریه (خارج از لیست فوق)
نوع مقاله Review Article
نحوه ایندکس شدن مقاله ایندکس شده سطح یک – ISI - Web of Science
آدرس لینک مقاله/ همایش در شبکه اینترنت

خلاصه مقاله
hide/show

BACKGROUND: Studies on relationship between tubal ligation and endometrial cancer have led to contradictory findings. In several studies, however, a reduced endometrial cancer risk was suggested following tubal ligation. Therefore, a systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to examine the relationship between tubal ligation and endometrial cancer risk. METHODS: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, PubMed/Medline, Web of Science, Scopus, Embase, and Google Scholar were searched for relevant studies published up to May 30th, 2018. We compared endometrial cancer risk in women with and without tubal ligation in retrieved studies. RESULTS: Two hundred nine studies were initially retrieved from the data bases. After exclusion of duplicates and studies which did not meet inclusion criteria, ten cohort and case-control studies, including 6,773,066 cases, were entered into the quantitative meta-analysis. There was 0.90% agreement between two researchers who searched and retrieved the studies. The summary OR (SOR) was reported using a random effect model. Begg's test suggested that there was no publication bias, but a considerable heterogeneity was observed (I2 = 95.4%, P = 0.001). We pooled the raw number of tables cells (i.e. a, b, c, and d) of eight studies. The SOR suggested that tubal ligation was significantly associated with a lower risk of endometrial cancer (SOR = 0.577, 95% CI = 0.420-0.792). Also, given the rare nature of endometrial cancer (< 5%), different effect sizes were considered as comparable measures of risk. Therefore we pooled ten studies and SOR of these studies revealed that tubal ligation was significantly associated with a lower risk of endometrial cancer (SOR = 0.696, 95% CI = 0.425-0.966). Besides that, we pooled eight studies in which adjusted effect sizes were reported and a subsequent analysis revealed that the summary estimate of adjusted odds ratio (SAOR) was significant (SAOR = 0.862, 95% CI = 0.698-1.026). CONCLUSIONS: This study revealed a protective effect of tubal ligation on endometrial cancer risk (approximately 42% lower risk of cancer). It is recommended that studies should be designed to reveal mechanisms of this relationship.

نویسندگان
hide/show

نویسنده نفر چندم مقاله
سعید صفیریچهارم

لینک دانلود مقاله
hide/show

نام فایل تاریخ درج فایل اندازه فایل دانلود
BMC Cancer.pdf1398/07/281427854دانلود