Comparison of Shear Bond Strength of Calcium-enriched Mixture Cement and Mineral Trioxide Aggregate to Composite Resin

Comparison of Shear Bond Strength of Calcium-enriched Mixture Cement and Mineral Trioxide Aggregate to Composite Resin


چاپ صفحه
پژوهان
صفحه نخست سامانه
چکیده مقاله
چکیده مقاله
نویسندگان
نویسندگان
دانلود مقاله
دانلود مقاله
دانشگاه علوم پزشکی تبریز
دانشگاه علوم پزشکی تبریز

نویسندگان: محمود بهاری , سیاوش سوادی اسکویی , سودابه کیمیائی , پریا مطهری

کلمات کلیدی: Keywords: CEM cement, Composite resin, MTA, RMGI, Shearbond strength.

نشریه: 55298 , 6 , 12 , 2011

اطلاعات کلی مقاله
hide/show

نویسنده ثبت کننده مقاله پریا مطهری
مرحله جاری مقاله تایید نهایی
دانشکده/مرکز مربوطه دانشکده دندانپزشکی
کد مقاله 69342
عنوان فارسی مقاله Comparison of Shear Bond Strength of Calcium-enriched Mixture Cement and Mineral Trioxide Aggregate to Composite Resin
عنوان لاتین مقاله Comparison of Shear Bond Strength of Calcium-enriched Mixture Cement and Mineral Trioxide Aggregate to Composite Resin
ناشر 6
آیا مقاله از طرح تحقیقاتی و یا منتورشیپ استخراج شده است؟ بلی
عنوان نشریه (خارج از لیست فوق)
نوع مقاله Original Article
نحوه ایندکس شدن مقاله ایندکس شده سطح دو – PubMed
آدرس لینک مقاله/ همایش در شبکه اینترنت

خلاصه مقاله
hide/show

Aim: Adhesion of composite resin and pulp capping biomaterialsremarkably influences treatment outcomes. This in vitro studyaimed to compare the shear bond strength of composite resinto calcium enriched mixture (CEM) cement, mineral trioxideaggregate (MTA) and resin modified glass ionomer (RMGI) withor without acid etching.Materials and methods: A total of 90 cylindrical acrylic blockscontaining a central hole, measuring 4 mm diameter and 2 mmheight were prepared. The blocks were randomly divided intothree experimental groups based on being filled with CEM, MTAor RMGI. Samples in each group were then randomly dividedinto two subgroups, i.e. with or without phosphoric acid etching.Placing composite resin cylinders on the samples, shear bondstrengths were measured using a universal testing machine.Failure modes of the samples were evaluated under astereomicroscope. Data were analyzed using two-way ANOVAand Tukey tests.Results: Shear bond strengths in the etched and nonetchedsamples were not significantly different (p = 0.60). There was asignificant difference in shear bond strength values of the threeexperimental materials (p < 0.001) and RMGI showed thehighest strength values (p < 0.001); no significant differencewas observed between MTA and CEM (p = 0.51). The interactionof the type of material and surface etching was statisticallysignificant (p < 0.001). All of the samples showed cohesive failuremode.Conclusion: Acid etching of MTA, CEM and RMGI do notimprove the shear bond strength of these materials to compositeresin. Besides, shear bond strength values of MTA and CEM tocomposite resin, are favorable due to their cohesive mode offailure.Clinical significance: When MTA and CEM biomaterials areused in vital pulp therapy, it is advisable to cover these materialswith RMGI. In addition, if it is not possible to use RMGI, thesurface etching of MTA and CEM biomaterials is not necessaryprior to composite restoration using total-etch adhesive resin.

نویسندگان
hide/show

نویسنده نفر چندم مقاله
محمود بهاریسوم
سیاوش سوادی اسکوییاول
سودابه کیمیائیدوم
پریا مطهریچهارم

لینک دانلود مقاله
hide/show

نام فایل تاریخ درج فایل اندازه فایل دانلود
b7d2f10cdc7da92c25b193f1955fa5a4f8c2-2.pdf1398/07/22394529دانلود