Effectiveness of intravenous lidocaine versus intravenous morphine for patients with renal colic in the emergency department

Effectiveness of intravenous lidocaine versus intravenous morphine for patients with renal colic in the emergency department


چاپ صفحه
پژوهان
صفحه نخست سامانه
چکیده مقاله
چکیده مقاله
نویسندگان
نویسندگان
دانلود مقاله
دانلود مقاله
دانشگاه علوم پزشکی تبریز
دانشگاه علوم پزشکی تبریز

نویسندگان: حسن سلیمانپور , کمال الدین حسن زاده نوکاشتی , صمد اسلام جمال گلزاری , رباب مهدیزاده , مریم سلیمان پور

کلمات کلیدی: Visual Analogue Pain Scale (VAS), Renal colic, Lidocaine, Morphine

نشریه: 5044 , 13 , 2 , 2012

اطلاعات کلی مقاله
hide/show

نویسنده ثبت کننده مقاله صمد اسلام جمال گلزاری
مرحله جاری مقاله تایید نهایی
دانشکده/مرکز مربوطه مرکز تحقیقات فلسفه و تاریخ پزشکی
کد مقاله 69179
عنوان فارسی مقاله Effectiveness of intravenous lidocaine versus intravenous morphine for patients with renal colic in the emergency department
عنوان لاتین مقاله Effectiveness of intravenous lidocaine versus intravenous morphine for patients with renal colic in the emergency department
ناشر 6
آیا مقاله از طرح تحقیقاتی و یا منتورشیپ استخراج شده است؟ خیر
عنوان نشریه (خارج از لیست فوق)
نوع مقاله Original Article
نحوه ایندکس شدن مقاله ایندکس شده سطح یک – ISI - Web of Science
آدرس لینک مقاله/ همایش در شبکه اینترنت

خلاصه مقاله
hide/show

Background: Despite the fact that numerous medications have been introduced to treat renal colic, none has been proven to relieve the pain rapidly and thoroughly. In this study, we aimed at comparing the effects of intravenous lidocaine versus intravenous morphine in patients suffering from renal colic. Methods: In a prospective randomized double-blind clinical trial performed in the emergency department of Imam Reza educational hospital of Tabriz, Iran, we studied 240 patients, 18–65 years old, who were referred due to renal colic. Patients were divided into two groups. In group I (120 people) single-dose intravenous lidocaine (1.5 mg/kg) was administered and in group II (120 people) single-dose intravenous morphine (0.1 mg/kg) was administered slowly. Visual Analogue Pain Scale (VAS) was recorded while admission, 5, 10, 15 and 30 minutes after injection. Statistical data and results were studied using descriptive statistics as percentage and Mean ± SD. To compare the response to treatment, Mann–Whitney U-test was used in two groups. Consequently, the data were analyzed using the SPSS16 software. Results: Pain score measured in two groups five minutes after the injection of lidocaine and morphine were 65 % and 53 % respectively (95% CI 0.60 - 0.69, CI 0.48 – 0.57, p = 0.0002).108 (90 %) patients (95 % CI 0.84 – 0.95) from group I and 84 (70%) patients (95 % CI 0.62 - 0.78) from group II responded appropriately at the end of the complete treatment. The difference was statistically significant (p = 0.0001). Conclusions: Changing the smooth muscle tone and reducing the transmission of afferent sensory pathways, lidocaine causes a significant reduction in pain. Trial registration: Clinical Trials IRCT138901042496N3

نویسندگان
hide/show

نویسنده نفر چندم مقاله
حسن سلیمانپوراول
کمال الدین حسن زاده نوکاشتیدوم
صمد اسلام جمال گلزاریچهارم
رباب مهدیزادهپنجم
مریم سلیمان پورششم

لینک دانلود مقاله
hide/show

نام فایل تاریخ درج فایل اندازه فایل دانلود
O-Lidocaine-morphine.pdf1398/07/13157392دانلود