Comparison of the influence of Two Flap Design on Periodontal Healing after Surgical Extraction of Impacted Third Molars

Comparison of the influence of Two Flap Design on Periodontal Healing after Surgical Extraction of Impacted Third Molars


چاپ صفحه
پژوهان
صفحه نخست سامانه
چکیده مقاله
چکیده مقاله
نویسندگان
نویسندگان
دانلود مقاله
دانلود مقاله
دانشگاه علوم پزشکی تبریز
دانشگاه علوم پزشکی تبریز

نویسندگان: سید احمد آرتا , رضا پورعباس خیرالدین , علی حسین مسگرزاده

کلمات کلیدی: Impacted lower third molar, periodontal complications, Szmyd and 3-cornered flaps.

نشریه: 19913 , 1 , 5 , 2011

اطلاعات کلی مقاله
hide/show

نویسنده ثبت کننده مقاله علی حسین مسگرزاده
مرحله جاری مقاله تایید نهایی
دانشکده/مرکز مربوطه دانشکده دندانپزشکی
کد مقاله 68530
عنوان فارسی مقاله Comparison of the influence of Two Flap Design on Periodontal Healing after Surgical Extraction of Impacted Third Molars
عنوان لاتین مقاله Comparison of the influence of Two Flap Design on Periodontal Healing after Surgical Extraction of Impacted Third Molars
ناشر 4
آیا مقاله از طرح تحقیقاتی و یا منتورشیپ استخراج شده است؟ خیر
عنوان نشریه (خارج از لیست فوق)
نوع مقاله Original Article
نحوه ایندکس شدن مقاله ایندکس شده سطح دو – PubMed
آدرس لینک مقاله/ همایش در شبکه اینترنت

خلاصه مقاله
hide/show

Background and aims. Impacted lower third molar is found in 90% of the general population. Impacted lower third molar surgery may result in periodontal complications on the distal surface of the adjacent second molar. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of flap design on the periodontal status of the second molar after lower third molar surgery. Materials and methods. Twenty patients, with an age range of 18-26 years, participated in the present study. The inclusion criteria consisted of the presence of bilateral symmetrical impacted third molars on panoramic radiographs. The subjects were randomly divided into two groups. The impactions on the left and right sides were operated by Szmyd and triangular flaps, respectively. Postoperative management and medications were similar for both groups. The subjects were evaluated at two-week, one-month, and six-month postoperative intervals by a surgeon who was blind to the results. Data was analyzed by t-test using SPSS 11 software. Results. There were no significant differences in clinical attachment loss, pocket depth, bone level, plaque index, and free gingival margin between the two flaps (p>0.05). Conclusion. The results of the present study did not show any differences in pocket depth, clinical attachment level, bone level and FGM (free gingival margin) between the two flap designs under study.

نویسندگان
hide/show

نویسنده نفر چندم مقاله
سید احمد آرتااول
رضا پورعباس خیرالدیندوم
علی حسین مسگرزادهسوم

لینک دانلود مقاله
hide/show

نام فایل تاریخ درج فایل اندازه فایل دانلود
5.pdf1398/07/22123332دانلود