A Comparative Study of Single Scrotal Incision Orchiopexy of Children with Palpable Low-Lying Undescended Testis with Traditional Inguinal Method

A Comparative Study of Single Scrotal Incision Orchiopexy of Children with Palpable Low-Lying Undescended Testis with Traditional Inguinal Method


چاپ صفحه
پژوهان
صفحه نخست سامانه
چکیده مقاله
چکیده مقاله
نویسندگان
نویسندگان
دانلود مقاله
دانلود مقاله
دانشگاه علوم پزشکی تبریز
دانشگاه علوم پزشکی تبریز

نویسندگان: داود بادبرین , سعید اصلان ابادی , ابراهیم فرهادی

کلمات کلیدی: : Orchiopexy; Scrotal incision; Undescended testis

نشریه: 0 , 25 , 1 , 2019

اطلاعات کلی مقاله
hide/show

نویسنده ثبت کننده مقاله داود بادبرین
مرحله جاری مقاله تایید نهایی
دانشکده/مرکز مربوطه دانشکده پزشکی
کد مقاله 68092
عنوان فارسی مقاله A Comparative Study of Single Scrotal Incision Orchiopexy of Children with Palpable Low-Lying Undescended Testis with Traditional Inguinal Method
عنوان لاتین مقاله A Comparative Study of Single Scrotal Incision Orchiopexy of Children with Palpable Low-Lying Undescended Testis with Traditional Inguinal Method
ناشر 5
آیا مقاله از طرح تحقیقاتی و یا منتورشیپ استخراج شده است؟ خیر
عنوان نشریه (خارج از لیست فوق) Journal of Korean Association of Pediatric Surgeons
نوع مقاله Original Article
نحوه ایندکس شدن مقاله ایندکس شده سطح چهار – سایر سایت های تخصصی
آدرس لینک مقاله/ همایش در شبکه اینترنت

خلاصه مقاله
hide/show

Purpose: Undescended testis (UDT) is a developmental defect in which one or both testicles do not arrive in the scrotum. Its prevalence at birth and one year after is 2%–4% and less than 1%, respectively. Currently, surgery is recommended to treat congenital cryptorchidism in order to prevent testicular degeneration. Classic method is performed via incision in inguinal and scrotum and the new method is done via incision in scrotum. Method: Sixty male participants with 65 UDT undergoing surgery were randomly assigned to scrotal incision (n=31) and classic inguinal incision methods (n=34). Patients were followed for 6 months and testicular atrophy, infection, recurrence, and duration of surgery were compared between two groups. Results: Scrotal incision compared to classic incision method had significantly lower duration of surgery (19.06±2.96 minutes vs. 30±10.42 minutes; p=0.002) and recurrence during follow-up (0 vs. 5 cases; p=0.026). There was only one surgical site infection in the scrotal incision method. There were hematoma and post-operative swelling in 13.3% of cases after scrotal incision method. Conclusion: Scrotal incision is an alternative method for the UDT with lower duration of surgery, lower recurrence rate, and better cosmetic results.

نویسندگان
hide/show

نویسنده نفر چندم مقاله
داود بادبریناول
سعید اصلان ابادیسوم
ابراهیم فرهادیچهارم

لینک دانلود مقاله
hide/show

نام فایل تاریخ درج فایل اندازه فایل دانلود
aps-25-14.pdf1398/05/03381244دانلود