Comparison of Accuracy of Conventional Periapical Radiography and Direct Digital Subtractions Radiography with or without Image Enhancement in the Diagnosis of Density Changes

Comparison of Accuracy of Conventional Periapical Radiography and Direct Digital Subtractions Radiography with or without Image Enhancement in the Diagnosis of Density Changes


چاپ صفحه
پژوهان
صفحه نخست سامانه
چکیده مقاله
چکیده مقاله
نویسندگان
نویسندگان
دانلود مقاله
دانلود مقاله
دانشگاه علوم پزشکی تبریز
دانشگاه علوم پزشکی تبریز

نویسندگان: تهمینه رازی , مرتضی قوجازاده

کلمات کلیدی: Density, direct digital subtraction radiography, image enhancement, periapical radiography.

نشریه: 19913 , 2 , 6 , 2012

اطلاعات کلی مقاله
hide/show

نویسنده ثبت کننده مقاله تهمینه رازی
مرحله جاری مقاله تایید نهایی
دانشکده/مرکز مربوطه دانشکده دندانپزشکی
کد مقاله 66945
عنوان فارسی مقاله Comparison of Accuracy of Conventional Periapical Radiography and Direct Digital Subtractions Radiography with or without Image Enhancement in the Diagnosis of Density Changes
عنوان لاتین مقاله Comparison of Accuracy of Conventional Periapical Radiography and Direct Digital Subtractions Radiography with or without Image Enhancement in the Diagnosis of Density Changes
ناشر 3
آیا مقاله از طرح تحقیقاتی و یا منتورشیپ استخراج شده است؟ خیر
عنوان نشریه (خارج از لیست فوق)
نوع مقاله Original Article
نحوه ایندکس شدن مقاله ایندکس شده سطح دو – PubMed
آدرس لینک مقاله/ همایش در شبکه اینترنت

خلاصه مقاله
hide/show

Background and aims. In periapical radiographic technique, the changes will be visible only after considerable deposition or resorption while digital subtraction technique visualizes slight density changes. This study was aimed to compare visualization of density changes in conventional periapical radiographs and digital subtraction technique with or without image enhancement. Materials and methods. Three dry human mandibles with unspecified age and gender were selected. Conventional periapical and direct digital radiographs were taken from the anterior, and right and left posterior regions by step-wise placement of aluminum plates until the image of the plate was clearly visible. The radiographs taken with the direct digital technique were subtracted from the first radiograph using Photoshop software. Three observers evaluated the radiographs and the digital subtraction images with or without image enhancement. The density was recorded in each radiograph in which the image of the aluminum plate was completely visible. Results. In all mandibles, the differences in diagnosis of density changes between the conventional periapical radiographic technique and the direct digital subtraction radiographic technique with or without image enhancement were statistically significant irrespective of the region under study (p<0.001). There were no significant differences in the diagnosis of density changes in all the three mandibles in the left and right posterior regions between the two radiographic techniques. However, the differences in the anterior region were statistically significant (p<0.001). Conclusion. Direct digital subtraction radiographic technique with or without image enhancement is a more efficacious technique in exhibiting minor density changes compared to conventional periapical radiographic technique.

نویسندگان
hide/show

نویسنده نفر چندم مقاله
تهمینه رازیاول
مرتضی قوجازادهسوم

لینک دانلود مقاله
hide/show

نام فایل تاریخ درج فایل اندازه فایل دانلود
Dr. Mohammadi.pdf1398/02/31280964دانلود