Methacholine challenge test with impulse oscillometry versus spirometry: which is more sensitive in detecting airway hyper-responsiveness (AHR?)

Methacholine challenge test with impulse oscillometry versus spirometry: which is more sensitive in detecting airway hyper-responsiveness (AHR?)


چاپ صفحه
پژوهان
صفحه نخست سامانه
نویسندگان
نویسندگان
اطلاعات تفضیلی
اطلاعات تفضیلی
دانلود مقاله
دانلود مقاله
دانشگاه علوم پزشکی تبریز
دانشگاه علوم پزشکی تبریز

نویسندگان: مسعود ناظمیه , اکبر شریفی

عنوان کنگره / همایش: 28th International Congress of the European-Respiratory-Society (ERS) , France , paris , 2018

اطلاعات کلی مقاله
hide/show

نویسنده ثبت کننده مقاله مسعود ناظمیه
مرحله جاری مقاله تایید نهایی
دانشکده/مرکز مربوطه مرکز تحقیقات سل و بیماری های ریوی
کد مقاله 66002
عنوان فارسی مقاله Methacholine challenge test with impulse oscillometry versus spirometry: which is more sensitive in detecting airway hyper-responsiveness (AHR?)
عنوان لاتین مقاله Methacholine challenge test with impulse oscillometry versus spirometry: which is more sensitive in detecting airway hyper-responsiveness (AHR?)
نوع ارائه نامشخص
عنوان کنگره / همایش 28th International Congress of the European-Respiratory-Society (ERS)
نوع کنگره / همایش بین المللی
کشور محل برگزاری کنگره/ همایش France
شهر محل برگزاری کنگره/ همایش paris
سال انتشار/ ارائه شمسی 1397
سال انتشار/ارائه میلادی 2018
تاریخ شمسی شروع و خاتمه کنگره/همایش 1397/06/24 الی 1397/06/28
آدرس لینک مقاله/ همایش در شبکه اینترنت
آدرس علمی (Affiliation) نویسنده متقاضی Tabriz Univ Med Sci, TB & Lung Dis Res Ctr, Tabriz, Iran

نویسندگان
hide/show

نویسنده نفر چندم مقاله
مسعود ناظمیهدوم
اکبر شریفیاول

اطلاعات تفضیلی
hide/show

عنوان متن
کلمات کلیدی
خلاصه مقالهBackground: Airway hyper responsiveness (AHR) is a characteristic feature of asthma. Methacholine challenge test (MCT) with spirometry is standard test for evaluating AHR, but this test has some restrictions in the diagnosis of AHR. MCT with impulse oscillometry (IOS) is a novel effort-independent method that directly measures airway resistance. Objectives: To compare the sensitivity of IOS and spirometry indices in order to assess a short protocol for MCT, in patients with symptoms suggesting AHR. Methods: This study, evaluated 235 adult patients with AHR symptoms and normal baseline spirometry, in lung diseases clinics, in Imam Reza hospital, Tabriz, Iran, in 2017. MCT with IOS as well as spirometry were performed. The primary endpoint was the Methacholine dose that caused a 20% reduction in FEV1 compared to baseline, or 40% increase in baseline respiratory resistance (Rrs5) measured by IOS. Results: These patients had a mean± standard deviation (STD) age of 34.79±1.30. The positive predictive value (PPV) of MCT with IOS, to detect a 20% reduction in FEV1, was 64.6% [95%CI 0.49-0.77] while for spirometry it was 30.1% [95%CI 0.23-0.38]. The area under the ROC curve was highest amount in the first stage performed using the IOS method, which was equal to 0.65 with p=0.01. Conclusion: The results showed the optimal sensitivity and negative predictive values of short protocol for MCT by IOS were higher than spirometry. During the challenge, the values of respiratory resistance at 5 Hz response preceded the FEV1 response. Therefore, IOS might be a reasonable screening test for detecting AHR

لینک دانلود مقاله
hide/show

نام فایل تاریخ درج فایل اندازه فایل دانلود
1.png1397/12/0945981دانلود
2.png1397/12/0932676دانلود