Cost and Effectiveness Analysis of Kangaroo Mother Care and Conventional Care Method in Low Birth Weight Neonates in Tabriz 2010‑2011

Cost and Effectiveness Analysis of Kangaroo Mother Care and Conventional Care Method in Low Birth Weight Neonates in Tabriz 2010‑2011


چاپ صفحه
پژوهان
صفحه نخست سامانه
چکیده مقاله
چکیده مقاله
نویسندگان
نویسندگان
دانلود مقاله
دانلود مقاله
دانشگاه علوم پزشکی تبریز
دانشگاه علوم پزشکی تبریز

نویسندگان: کمال قلی پور , علی جنتی , محمدباقر حسینی

کلمات کلیدی: Key words: Conventional care method, cost, effectiveness, kangaroo mother care, low birth weight neonates

نشریه: 42234 , 3 , 3 , 2014

اطلاعات کلی مقاله
hide/show

نویسنده ثبت کننده مقاله علی جنتی
مرحله جاری مقاله تایید نهایی
دانشکده/مرکز مربوطه دانشکده مدیریت و اطلاع رسانی پزشکی
کد مقاله 64450
عنوان فارسی مقاله Cost and Effectiveness Analysis of Kangaroo Mother Care and Conventional Care Method in Low Birth Weight Neonates in Tabriz 2010‑2011
عنوان لاتین مقاله Cost and Effectiveness Analysis of Kangaroo Mother Care and Conventional Care Method in Low Birth Weight Neonates in Tabriz 2010‑2011
ناشر 6
آیا مقاله از طرح تحقیقاتی و یا منتورشیپ استخراج شده است؟ خیر
عنوان نشریه (خارج از لیست فوق)
نوع مقاله Original Article
نحوه ایندکس شدن مقاله ایندکس شده سطح چهار – Index Copernicus
آدرس لینک مقاله/ همایش در شبکه اینترنت

خلاصه مقاله
hide/show

Objective: This study aimed to compare the cost and effectiveness of Kangaroo mother care (KMC) and conventional methods of care in low birth weight (LBW) neonates. Materials and Methods: A retrospective economic evaluation conducted in Al‑Zahra Teaching Maternity Hospital of Tabriz, Iran by participating 45 LBW and preterm neonate in each therapeutic groups (90 neonates). Convenience sampling used to select participants from KMC and conventional care method (CCM) (incubator) groups in 2010-2011. Baseline characteristics, therapeutic interventions, resources utilization data and clinical events during the initial hospitalization and at 2‑month follow‑up were collected according a detailed case report forms. Data are described as mean (standard deviation) and no (percentage) and were compared with Student’s t‑test, χ2 and Fisher exact test between groups. P ≤ 0.05 were considered to be statistically significant. Data were analyzed using the SPSS‑16 statistical package. Result: The mean birth weight (BW) of the patients in KMC group was 1240.89 (5.98) g and in CCM was 1133.78 (139.06) g, hence differences in BW was statistically significant (P < 0.001). Greatest cause of problem in groups was icter and after that preterm birth and House Dust Mite ( HDM) with icter were the most frequent problem between neonates. In 2 months follow‑up period, 3.7% of infants cared with KMC and conventional methods died respectively (P = 0.078). Daily weight gain was 12.28 g in KMC group and 9.65 g in conventional group (P = 0.011). The mean cost of hospitalization per individual infant for KMC was 3539.47$, whereas for Conventional group was 2907.27$. Conclusion: KMC promoted weight gain in LBW infants better than conventional care. Although KMC’s unit cost is a little higher than Conventional method, but comparing its positive outcomes on breastfeeding’s and mortality it can be considered as cost effective method.

نویسندگان
hide/show

نویسنده نفر چندم مقاله
کمال قلی پوردوم
علی جنتیسوم
محمدباقر حسینیچهارم

لینک دانلود مقاله
hide/show

نام فایل تاریخ درج فایل اندازه فایل دانلود
Cost and effectiveness analysis of Kangaroo .pdf1397/08/10378069دانلود