Barriers, Facilitators, Process and Sources of Evidence for Evidence-Based Management among Health Care Managers: A Qualitative Systematic Review

Barriers, Facilitators, Process and Sources of Evidence for Evidence-Based Management among Health Care Managers: A Qualitative Systematic Review


چاپ صفحه
پژوهان
صفحه نخست سامانه
چکیده مقاله
چکیده مقاله
نویسندگان
نویسندگان
دانلود مقاله
دانلود مقاله
دانشگاه علوم پزشکی تبریز
دانشگاه علوم پزشکی تبریز

نویسندگان: ادریس حسن پور , سکینه حاج ابراهیمی , علی جنتی , الهه حق گشایی

کلمات کلیدی: Evidence-based management, evidence-based medicine, healthcare organizations

نشریه: 42803 , 5 , 28 , 2018

اطلاعات کلی مقاله
hide/show

نویسنده ثبت کننده مقاله ادریس حسن پور
مرحله جاری مقاله تایید نهایی
دانشکده/مرکز مربوطه دانشکده مدیریت و اطلاع رسانی پزشکی
کد مقاله 64153
عنوان فارسی مقاله Barriers, Facilitators, Process and Sources of Evidence for Evidence-Based Management among Health Care Managers: A Qualitative Systematic Review
عنوان لاتین مقاله Barriers, Facilitators, Process and Sources of Evidence for Evidence-Based Management among Health Care Managers: A Qualitative Systematic Review
ناشر 4
آیا مقاله از طرح تحقیقاتی و یا منتورشیپ استخراج شده است؟ خیر
عنوان نشریه (خارج از لیست فوق) Ethiopian Journal of Health Sciences
نوع مقاله Review Article
نحوه ایندکس شدن مقاله ایندکس شده سطح دو – PubMed
آدرس لینک مقاله/ همایش در شبکه اینترنت

خلاصه مقاله
hide/show

BACKGROUND: Evidence-based management (EBMgt) improves managerial decisions as a bridge from theory to practice. For reason that it has a critical impact on organization performance. The purpose of this study was to identify factors affecting EBMgt among managers. METHODS: The following electronic databases were used: PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane, ProQuest, Embase and Scopus. In addition, we searched Google Scholar, Emerald, Academy of Management (AOM), and the website for the Center for Evidence-Based Management (CEBMa) for articles related to EBMgt. We used data sources published up to September 2017, without language restriction. We appraised the methodological quality of studies using the checklists of SRQR and MMAT. The synthesis involved interpretative analysis based on the principles of meta-synthesis. RESULTS: Of 26,011 identified studies, 26 met the full inclusion criteria. Of the 26 studies assessed, the frequency of qualitative studies and mixed-methods were 20 and 6, respectively, and the quality of 3 studies was weak. A total of 23 studies from 7 countries were included: Canada (n=8), USA (n=6), Australia (n=4), UK (n=3), Iran (n=1, Brazil (n=1); none were from Africa. Meta-synthesis findings of 23 studies identified four main factors: facilitators (5 main themes), barriers (5 main themes), sources of evidence (4 main themes), and the process of decision making in EBMgt (1 main theme). CONCLUSIONS: EBMgt is crucial to improve the quality of management decisions, and hence, to improve service delivery, effectiveness and efficiency. Furthermore, to increase the benefit and utilization of EBMgt, training organizations and research institutes must more actively involve managers in setting research plans.

نویسندگان
hide/show

نویسنده نفر چندم مقاله
ادریس حسن پوراول
سکینه حاج ابراهیمیدوم
علی جنتیسوم
الهه حق گشاییپنجم

لینک دانلود مقاله
hide/show

نام فایل تاریخ درج فایل اندازه فایل دانلود
Page 665-680 Evidence-Based-Mgmt.pdf1397/07/19717294دانلود