Newfangled Procedures Using X-ray to Determine the Cobb Angle in Patients with Scoliosis: An Updated Systematic Review
Newfangled Procedures Using X-ray to Determine the Cobb Angle in Patients with Scoliosis: An Updated Systematic Review
نویسندگان: نازیلا مفتیان , پیمان رضایی , حجت حسین پور فیضی , طاها صمدسلطانی , مسعود پورعیسی , زهرا صلاح زاده
کلمات کلیدی: Spine, scoliosis, diagnostic imaging, image processing, computer-assisted, radiography, decision support systems
نشریه: 8561 , 6 , 14 , 2018
| نویسنده ثبت کننده مقاله |
زهرا صلاح زاده |
| مرحله جاری مقاله |
تایید نهایی |
| دانشکده/مرکز مربوطه |
دانشکده علوم توانبخشی |
| کد مقاله |
64058 |
| عنوان فارسی مقاله |
Newfangled Procedures Using X-ray to Determine the Cobb Angle in Patients with Scoliosis: An Updated Systematic Review |
| عنوان لاتین مقاله |
Newfangled Procedures Using X-ray to Determine the Cobb Angle in Patients with Scoliosis: An Updated Systematic Review |
| ناشر |
7 |
| آیا مقاله از طرح تحقیقاتی و یا منتورشیپ استخراج شده است؟ |
بلی |
| عنوان نشریه (خارج از لیست فوق) |
|
| نوع مقاله |
Review Article |
| نحوه ایندکس شدن مقاله |
ایندکس شده سطح یک – ISI - Web of Science |
| آدرس لینک مقاله/ همایش در شبکه اینترنت |
|
| Abstract: Background: Scoliosis is a three-dimensional deformity of the spine. It is usually assessed
by measuring Cobb angle. Nowadays, due to increasing effectiveness of image processing
and machine vision, willingness to apply these methods has improved considerably in determining
scoliosis of Cobb angle.
Methods: In accordance with the PRISMA guideline, a broad electronic search of all English language
literature was conducted on the topic through four databases, including MEDLINE, Web of
Science, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library from 2012 (last search date from earlier review) to 30
March 2017.
Results: Twelve studies were included. 90% labeled high-quality were selected for analysis. Eighty
percent of the selected studies were published in the period between 2012 and 2017. Three new
procedures were used to measure the Cobb angle. One study used automated procedure (7%), two
studies used smartphone procedure (14%), and nine studies used the semiautomatic procedure of
Cobb measurement (79%). Seven studies reported reproducibility and repeatability. Reproducibility
range was 0.72 to 1 in reporting of ICC. Repeatability has a high range in three separated
methods.
Conclusion: Computerized assessment method (Automatic and Semi-automatic) is most commonly
performed in Cobb measurement. Semi-automatic is an effective measurement option for
computerized assessment Cobb angle. There is no significant difference between manual, computer-
based, and smartphone-based methods in described measures. |
| نام فایل |
تاریخ درج فایل |
اندازه فایل |
دانلود |
| moftiyan paper .pdf | 1398/05/20 | 796913 | دانلود |