چاپ صفحه |  صفحه نخست سامانه |  چکیده مقاله |  نویسندگان |  دانلود مقاله | دانشگاه علوم پزشکی تبریز |
| نویسنده ثبت کننده مقاله | کاووس شهسواری نیا |
| مرحله جاری مقاله | تایید نهایی |
| دانشکده/مرکز مربوطه | مرکز مدیریت و پیشگیری از مصدومیتهای حوادث ترافیکی,مرکز مدیریت و پیشگیری از مصدومیتهای حوادث ترافیکی |
| کد مقاله | 60502 |
| عنوان فارسی مقاله | Worthing Physiological Score vs Revised Trauma Score in Outcome Prediction of Trauma patients; a Comparative Study |
| عنوان لاتین مقاله | Worthing Physiological Score vs Revised Trauma Score in Outcome Prediction of Trauma patients; a Comparative Study |
| ناشر | 10 |
| آیا مقاله از طرح تحقیقاتی و یا منتورشیپ استخراج شده است؟ | خیر |
| عنوان نشریه (خارج از لیست فوق) | Emergency |
| نوع مقاله | Original Article |
| نحوه ایندکس شدن مقاله | ایندکس شده سطح دو – PubMed |
| آدرس لینک مقاله/ همایش در شبکه اینترنت | www.jemerg.com |
| Introduction: Awareness about the outcome of trauma patients in the emergency department (ED) has become a topic of interest. Accordingly, the present study aimed to compare the rapid trauma score (RTS) and worthing physiological scoring system (WPSS) in predicting in-hospital mortality and poor outcome of trauma patients. Methods: In this comparative study trauma patients brought to five EDs in different cities of Iran during the year 2016were included. After data collection, discriminatory power and calibration of the modelswere assessed and compared using STATA 11. Results: 2148 patientswith themean age of 39.50§17.27 yearswere included (75.56% males). The AUC of RTS and WPSS models for prediction ofmortalitywere 0.86 (95% CI: 0.82-0.90) and 0.91 (95% CI: 0.87-0.94), respectively (p=0.006). RTS had a sensitivity of 71.54 (95%CI: 62.59-79.13) and a specificity of 97.38 (95% CI: 96.56-98.01) in prediction of mortality. These measures for the WPSS were 87.80 (95% CI: 80.38-92.78) and 83.45 (95% CI: 81.75-85.04), respectively. The AUC of RTS and WPSS in predicting poor outcome were 0.81 (95% CI: 0.77-0.85) and 0.89 (95% CI: 0.85-0.92), respectively (p<0.0001). Conclusion: The findings showed a higher prognostic value for the WPSS model in predicting mortality and severe disabilities in trauma patients compared to the RTS model. Both models had good overall performance in prediction of mortality and poor outcome. |
| نویسنده | نفر چندم مقاله |
|---|---|
| کاووس شهسواری نیا | هشتم |
| نام فایل | تاریخ درج فایل | اندازه فایل | دانلود |
|---|---|---|---|
| Worthing_Physiological_Score_vs_Revised.pdf | 1399/11/12 | 268984 | دانلود |
