Can galvanic skin conductance be used as an objective indicator of children's anxiety in the dental setting?

Can galvanic skin conductance be used as an objective indicator of children's anxiety in the dental setting?


چاپ صفحه
پژوهان
صفحه نخست سامانه
چکیده مقاله
چکیده مقاله
نویسندگان
نویسندگان
دانلود مقاله
دانلود مقاله
دانشگاه علوم پزشکی تبریز
دانشگاه علوم پزشکی تبریز

نویسندگان: ابراهیم نجف پور , ناصر اصل امین آبادی , زهرا جمالی , سجاد شیرازی

کلمات کلیدی: Key words:Dental anxiety, reliability, validity, galvanic skin response.

نشریه: 19695 , 3 , 9 , 2017

اطلاعات کلی مقاله
hide/show

نویسنده ثبت کننده مقاله سجاد شیرازی
مرحله جاری مقاله تایید نهایی
دانشکده/مرکز مربوطه مرکز تحقیقات لثه و دندان
کد مقاله 60419
عنوان فارسی مقاله Can galvanic skin conductance be used as an objective indicator of children's anxiety in the dental setting?
عنوان لاتین مقاله Can galvanic skin conductance be used as an objective indicator of children's anxiety in the dental setting?
ناشر 5
آیا مقاله از طرح تحقیقاتی و یا منتورشیپ استخراج شده است؟ بلی
عنوان نشریه (خارج از لیست فوق)
نوع مقاله Original Article
نحوه ایندکس شدن مقاله ایندکس شده سطح دو – PubMed
آدرس لینک مقاله/ همایش در شبکه اینترنت https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28298978

خلاصه مقاله
hide/show

BACKGROUND: Assessment of procedural distress is essential at assisting children during invasive dental treatments. This study aimed to determine the validity and reliability of galvanic skin response as a measure for assessment of dental anxiety in children. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 151 children, aged 5-7 years, participated in this study. Similar dental treatments were rendered to all subjects. At the beginning and end of the session, modified child dental anxiety scale (MCDAS), clinical anxiety rating scale (CARS) and galvanic skin response (GSR) were used to determine children's anxiety. RESULTS: GSR was significantly correlated with both MCDAS (rs=0.62, p=0.02) and CARS (rs=0.44, p=0.032). The correlation between MCDAS and CARS was also significant (rs = 0.9, P<0.001). Anxiety decreased during the session in both GSR (rs=0.52, p=0.001) and MCDAS scales (rs=0.77, p=0.001). CARS also showed a reduction between the initial and second assessment, but it was not statistically significant (rs=0.12, P=0.36). CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that GSR is a reliable and valid measure for assessment of children's dental anxiety in the clinical context. GSR may help to identify clinically anxious children before dental treatment to provide appropriate interventions.

نویسندگان
hide/show

نویسنده نفر چندم مقاله
ابراهیم نجف پوراول
ناصر اصل امین آبادیدوم
زهرا جمالیچهارم
سجاد شیرازیپنجم

لینک دانلود مقاله
hide/show

نام فایل تاریخ درج فایل اندازه فایل دانلود
jced-9-e377.pdf1396/01/14609229دانلود