COMPARING THE COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF AVONEX AND BETAFERON IN THE MANAGEMENT OF MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS IN IRAN

COMPARING THE COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF AVONEX AND BETAFERON IN THE MANAGEMENT OF MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS IN IRAN


چاپ صفحه
پژوهان
صفحه نخست سامانه
نویسندگان
نویسندگان
اطلاعات تفضیلی
اطلاعات تفضیلی
دانلود مقاله
دانلود مقاله
دانشگاه علوم پزشکی تبریز
دانشگاه علوم پزشکی تبریز

نویسندگان: علی ایمانی , مینا گلستانی

عنوان کنگره / همایش: ISPOR 14TH Annual European Congress Research Abstracts , , Madrid , 2011

اطلاعات کلی مقاله
hide/show

نویسنده ثبت کننده مقاله علی ایمانی
مرحله جاری مقاله تایید نهایی
دانشکده/مرکز مربوطه دانشکده مدیریت و اطلاع رسانی پزشکی
کد مقاله 59874
عنوان فارسی مقاله COMPARING THE COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF AVONEX AND BETAFERON IN THE MANAGEMENT OF MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS IN IRAN
عنوان لاتین مقاله COMPARING THE COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF AVONEX AND BETAFERON IN THE MANAGEMENT OF MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS IN IRAN
نوع ارائه پوستر
عنوان کنگره / همایش ISPOR 14TH Annual European Congress Research Abstracts
نوع کنگره / همایش وب پوستر
کشور محل برگزاری کنگره/ همایش
شهر محل برگزاری کنگره/ همایش Madrid
سال انتشار/ ارائه شمسی 1390
سال انتشار/ارائه میلادی 2011
تاریخ شمسی شروع و خاتمه کنگره/همایش 1390/10/22 الی 1390/10/25
آدرس لینک مقاله/ همایش در شبکه اینترنت http://www.valueinhealthjournal.com/article/S1098-3015%2811%2902057-2/fulltext
آدرس علمی (Affiliation) نویسنده متقاضی Tabriz University of Medical sciences , Tabriz, Iran

نویسندگان
hide/show

نویسنده نفر چندم مقاله
علی ایمانیاول
مینا گلستانیدوم

اطلاعات تفضیلی
hide/show

عنوان متن
خلاصه مقالهObjectives Multiple sclerosis (MS) is the neurologic disability that can dramatically affect the quality of life (QoL) of patients and their families. Family life, economic status, and social interaction may be affected by somatic symptoms of the disease. Approximately 70,000 people in the Islamic Republic of Iran are affected by MS. Under budgetary constraints,Cost-effectiveness and cost-utility analyses (CEA/CUAs) are useful tools to assess the tradeoff between the added costs and potential benefits (e.g., improved patient outcomes) of new therapies. Methods The primary objective of this analysis was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of Avonex compared with Betaferon from the Iranian Ministry of Health(MoH) over a 2-year time horizon. The relative risk reduction (RRR) method was used to compare reduction in relapse rates and disease progression data from pivotal randomized double-blind placebo-controlled clinical trials of the DMDs. The evaluation was conducted from the perspective of a Iranian health care sector (direct medical costs and indirect cost considered). The primary economic endpoint was cost per relapse avoided . Costs and outcomes occurring in the second year were discounted 3% to bring to 2010 present values. One way sensitivity analyses were conducted on key input variables to assess their impact on cost per relapse avoided. Results The 2-year reductions in clinical relapses for treatment with Avonex,Betaferon were 0.69 and 0.60 relatively. In the base case analysis, Avonex had the most favorable costs per relapse avoided (2652778 Rials) rather than Betaferon. Sensitivity analyses showed that these results were robust to changes in key input parameters, such as the number of relapses and disease progression steps in untreated patients, the progression rates, the average cost of relapse. Conclusions This evaluation suggests that IFN β-1a SC injection(Avonex) represent the most cost-effective DMDs for the treatment of RRMS, where cost-effectiveness is defined as cost per relapse avoided,rather than Bataferon.
کلمات کلیدی

لینک دانلود مقاله
hide/show

نام فایل تاریخ درج فایل اندازه فایل دانلود
PND29.pdf1395/10/2760078دانلود
PND 29.png1395/10/27645754دانلود