چاپ صفحه |  صفحه نخست سامانه |  چکیده مقاله |  نویسندگان |  دانلود مقاله | دانشگاه علوم پزشکی تبریز |
| نویسنده ثبت کننده مقاله | امیراردلان عبدالهی |
| مرحله جاری مقاله | تایید نهایی |
| دانشکده/مرکز مربوطه | مرکز تحقیقات لثه و دندان |
| کد مقاله | 58681 |
| عنوان فارسی مقاله | تاثیر بی حسی با کرم لیدوکائین-پریلوکائین(EMLA) و فشار موضعی بر درد حین تزریق انفیلتراسیون در کانین های ماگزیلاری: مطالعه ی کلینیکی تضادفی دوسو کور |
| عنوان لاتین مقاله | Effect of Topical Anesthesia with Lidocaine–Prilocaine (EMLA) Cream and Local Pressure on Pain during Infiltration Injection for Maxillary Canines: A Randomized Double-blind Clinical Trial |
| ناشر | 6 |
| آیا مقاله از طرح تحقیقاتی و یا منتورشیپ استخراج شده است؟ | بلی |
| عنوان نشریه (خارج از لیست فوق) | |
| نوع مقاله | Original Article |
| نحوه ایندکس شدن مقاله | ایندکس شده سطح دو – Medline |
| آدرس لینک مقاله/ همایش در شبکه اینترنت | http://www.jaypeejournals.com/eJournals/Abstract.aspx?id=9779&AID=24&num=15 |
| Objectives: This study compared the effect of local pressure and topical lidocaine-prilocaine (EMLA) cream on pain during infiltration injection for maxillary canine teeth. Methods: A total of 140 volunteer students participated in this split-mouth design randomized clinical trial. The subjects were randomly divided into 4 groups (n=35). Before administration of anesthesia, in each group one side was randomly selected as the experimental and the opposite side as the control. In group 1, finger pressure was applied on the alveolar mucosa on the experimental and on the tooth crown on the control sides. In group 2, 5% EMLA cream and placebo, in group 3, finger pressure and 5% EMLA cream and in group 4, 5% EMLA cream and 20% benzocaine gel were applied. In all the groups, a buccal infiltration procedure was carried out. Pain during injection was recorded with visual analog scale (VAS). Wilcoxon and McNemar tests were used for statistical analysis of the results. Statistical significance was set at P<0.05. Results: The results showed that EMLA reduced the injection pain significantly more than benzocaine (P=0.02). Also, injection pain was significantly lower with the use of EMLA in comparison to placebo (P=0.00). Application of local pressure reduced the injection pain, but the difference from the control side was not significant (P=0.05). Furtheremore, the difference between application of local pressure and EMLA was not statistically significant (P=0.08). Conclusion: Topical anesthesia of 5% EMLA was more effective than 20% benzocaine in reducing pain severity during infiltration injection. However, it was not significantly different in comparison to the application of local pressure. |
| نویسنده | نفر چندم مقاله |
|---|---|
| امین سالم میلانی | اول |
| وحید زند | دوم |
| امیراردلان عبدالهی | سوم |
| پروین ذاکری میلانی | پنجم |
| محمد اصغری جعفرآبادی | ششم |
| نام فایل | تاریخ درج فایل | اندازه فایل | دانلود |
|---|---|---|---|
| published article.pdf | 1395/06/20 | 589890 | دانلود |
