چاپ صفحه |  صفحه نخست سامانه |  چکیده مقاله |  نویسندگان |  دانلود مقاله | دانشگاه علوم پزشکی تبریز |
| نویسنده ثبت کننده مقاله | محمود بهاری |
| مرحله جاری مقاله | تایید نهایی |
| دانشکده/مرکز مربوطه | مرکز تحقیقات لثه و دندان |
| کد مقاله | 57444 |
| عنوان فارسی مقاله | استحکام باند برشی CEM و MTAبه رزین کامپوزیت با استفاده از دو نوع سیستم ادهزیو |
| عنوان لاتین مقاله | Shear bond strength of calcium enriched mixture cement and mineral trioxide aggregate to composite resin with two different adhesive systems. |
| ناشر | 6 |
| آیا مقاله از طرح تحقیقاتی و یا منتورشیپ استخراج شده است؟ | بلی |
| عنوان نشریه (خارج از لیست فوق) | J Dent (Tehran) |
| نوع مقاله | Original Article |
| نحوه ایندکس شدن مقاله | ایندکس شده سطح دو – PMC |
| آدرس لینک مقاله/ همایش در شبکه اینترنت | http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4281188/ |
| Abstract OBJECTIVE: Immediate restoration after vital pulp therapy is essential in order to create and maintain effective coronal seal. PURPOSE OF STUDY: The aim of this study was to evaluate the shear bond strength of recently used pulp capping materials: white mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA), and calcium enriched mixture cement (CEM) to composite resin with the use of etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesive systems and compare them with the bond strength of commonly used resin modified glass ionomer (RMGI) cement. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty specimens from each test material were fabricated, measuring 4 mm in diameter and 2 mm in depth. The specimens of each material were divided into 2 groups of 20 specimens according to the adhesive system (Single Bond vs. Clearfil SE Bond) used for bonding of resin composite. The shear bond strength values were measured at a crosshead speed of 1.0 mm/min and fractured surfaces were examined. Data were analyzed using two-way ANOVA and a post hoc Tukey's test (P<0.05). RESULTS: Analysis of data showed a significantly higher bond strength for RMGI compared to MTA and CEM (P<0.001); however, no significant differences were observed in the bond strength values of MTA and CEM (P=0.9). Furthermore, there were no significant differences in relation to the type of the adhesive system irrespective of the type of the material used (P=0.95) All the failures were of cohesive type in RMGI, MTA and CEM. CONCLUSION: Bond strength of RMGI cement to composite resin was higher than that of MTA or CEM cement irrespective of the type of the adhesive system. |
| نویسنده | نفر چندم مقاله |
|---|---|
| سیاوش سوادی اسکویی | اول |
| محمود بهاری | دوم |
| سودابه کیمیائی | سوم |
| پریا مطهری | چهارم |
| نام فایل | تاریخ درج فایل | اندازه فایل | دانلود |
|---|---|---|---|
| JDT-MOTAHARI.pdf | 1394/12/18 | 332583 | دانلود |
| JDT-MOTAHARI.pdf | 1394/12/18 | 332583 | دانلود |
